Skip to main content

The Gods Themselves: Rhetoric and Myth in Sumer, Egypt, and Greece Before 355 BCE: Acknowledgments

The Gods Themselves: Rhetoric and Myth in Sumer, Egypt, and Greece Before 355 BCE
Acknowledgments
  • Show the following:

    Annotations
    Resources
  • Adjust appearance:

    Font
    Font style
    Color Scheme
    Light
    Dark
    Annotation contrast
    Low
    High
    Margins
  • Search within:
    • My Notes + Comments
    • Notifications
    • Privacy
  • Project HomeThe Gods Themselves
  • Projects
  • Learn more about Manifold

Notes

table of contents
  1. Cover Page
  2. Title Page
  3. Copyright Page
  4. Contents
  5. List of Illustrations
  6. Foreword
  7. Introduction
    1. The Recorded Emergence of Rhetoric in Antiquity
    2. The History of Rhetoric and Onomastic Fallacy
    3. How Myths Made Meaning
    4. The Ontology of Mythic Rhetoric
    5. The Ontological Nature of Rhetorical Myth
    6. Relational Ontology
    7. The Shape of Things to Come
  8. Chapter 1: Nisaba and the Identification of Sumerian Rhetoric
    1. The Nature of Divine Agency in Sumer
    2. Nisaba, Signs, and Divination in Mesopotamia
    3. Sumerian Metaphor and Anthropomorphism
    4. Signs, Nisaba, and Her Ontology in the Sumerian Corpus
    5. Nisaba as a Contrastive Identification of Rhetoric
  9. Chapter 2: Sumerian Narrative Myth and the Relational Nature of Rhetoric in the Aratta Epics
    1. The Contextual Background for Enmerkar and the Lord of Aratta
    2. Enmerkar and En-suhgir-ana as Illustration of Inim, Rhetoric, and Relational Ontology
    3. The Rhetorical Nature of Human–Divine Communication
    4. Sign, Word, and Writing
    5. The Rhetorical Function of the Enmerkar Cycle
    6. The Analogical Function of Myth in Lugalbanda and the Anzud Bird
  10. Chapter 3: Egyptian Rhetoric, Seshat, and Rhetoric-as-Being
    1. The “Problem” of Egyptian Myth
    2. Archival Knowledge and the Primordial Rhetorical Goddess
    3. Preceptive and Generative Design
    4. Seshat as Mediating Rhetorical Agent
  11. Chapter 4: Thoth and the Relational Nature of Egyptian Rhetoric
    1. Thoth in Egypt as the Messenger and Expression of Relational Rhetoric
    2. Prayers and Hymns to Thoth and the Haremhab Scroll
    3. Thoth’s Egyptian Identity as Narrative Exemplar
    4. Magic and Thoth’s Rhetorical Role
    5. The Long Afterlife of Thoth
  12. Chapter 5: The Beginnings of Rhetorical Myth in Ancient Greece
    1. The Derveni Papyrus, Prodicus of Ceos, and Anthropogenic Theogony
    2. Isocrates, Rhetorical Myth, and the Busiris
    3. Plato’s Protagoras and Theuth
  13. Chapter 6: Plato, Atlantean Rhetoric, Mythic σχῆμα (Schema), and the Speeches of Critias
    1. Plato’s Myths and the Timaeus-Critias in Rhetorical Theory
    2. Timaeus, the Priest of Sais, and skema muthos
    3. Atlantis as a Skema for a Scriptocentric and Rhetorical Social Order
    4. Atlantis as a Relational Rhetorical Myth
  14. Conclusion
  15. Acknowledgments
  16. Notes
    1. Introduction: Rhetoric, Myth, and Rhetorical Myth
    2. Chapter 1: Nisaba and the Identification of Sumerian Rhetoric
    3. Chapter 2: Sumerian Narrative Myth and the Relational Nature of Rhetoric in the Aratta Epics
    4. Chapter 5: The Beginnings of Rhetorical Myth in Ancient Greece
    5. Chapter 6: Plato, Atlantean Rhetoric, Mythic σχῆμα (Schema), and the Speeches of Critias
    6. Conclusion: An Apologia for the Persistently Magical
  17. Bibliography
  18. Index

Acknowledgments

Page 181 →This book has been made available open access thanks to the financial and material support provided by the University of South Carolina Libraries. They have supported its distribution so that whatever knowledge is within it can find its highest and best use, free to all people, at all times and everywhere. All proceeds from the print edition have been rendered back to the publisher for their long support of the study of the history of rhetoric.

Rhetorical myth is often filled with tales of unseen benevolent intelligences that fill the whole world. This work has been an effort of many hands who assisted in its completion. I thank Richard Leo Enos, who has assisted at nearly every stage of this book. Additionally, I received support and encouragement from Professor Scott Sundvall, Professor Elizabeth Rohan, Dr. Suzan Aiken, Professor Janet Atwill, Dr. Claudia Langosch, Professor Richard Averbeck, Professor Hany Rashwan, and Professor Joshua Gunn. Sadly, it is impossible to name all of the many rhetoricians who aided in this work, as they acted as anonymous peer reviewers in articles formative to its completion, but they are not forgotten. The University of Doha for Science and Technology also deserves thanks for support of my work.

Finally, I would like to thank my beloved wife, Almagul Ramsey, for her abiding belief in my work and her endless devotion.

Annotate

Next Chapter
Notes
PreviousNext
© 2026 University of South Carolina
Powered by Manifold Scholarship. Learn more at
Opens in new tab or windowmanifoldapp.org