Skip to main content

The Gods Themselves: Rhetoric and Myth in Sumer, Egypt, and Greece Before 355 BCE: Index

The Gods Themselves: Rhetoric and Myth in Sumer, Egypt, and Greece Before 355 BCE
Index
  • Show the following:

    Annotations
    Resources
  • Adjust appearance:

    Font
    Font style
    Color Scheme
    Light
    Dark
    Annotation contrast
    Low
    High
    Margins
  • Search within:
    • My Notes + Comments
    • Notifications
    • Privacy
  • Project HomeThe Gods Themselves
  • Projects
  • Learn more about Manifold

Notes

table of contents
  1. Cover Page
  2. Title Page
  3. Copyright Page
  4. Contents
  5. List of Illustrations
  6. Foreword
  7. Introduction
    1. The Recorded Emergence of Rhetoric in Antiquity
    2. The History of Rhetoric and Onomastic Fallacy
    3. How Myths Made Meaning
    4. The Ontology of Mythic Rhetoric
    5. The Ontological Nature of Rhetorical Myth
    6. Relational Ontology
    7. The Shape of Things to Come
  8. Chapter 1: Nisaba and the Identification of Sumerian Rhetoric
    1. The Nature of Divine Agency in Sumer
    2. Nisaba, Signs, and Divination in Mesopotamia
    3. Sumerian Metaphor and Anthropomorphism
    4. Signs, Nisaba, and Her Ontology in the Sumerian Corpus
    5. Nisaba as a Contrastive Identification of Rhetoric
  9. Chapter 2: Sumerian Narrative Myth and the Relational Nature of Rhetoric in the Aratta Epics
    1. The Contextual Background for Enmerkar and the Lord of Aratta
    2. Enmerkar and En-suhgir-ana as Illustration of Inim, Rhetoric, and Relational Ontology
    3. The Rhetorical Nature of Human–Divine Communication
    4. Sign, Word, and Writing
    5. The Rhetorical Function of the Enmerkar Cycle
    6. The Analogical Function of Myth in Lugalbanda and the Anzud Bird
  10. Chapter 3: Egyptian Rhetoric, Seshat, and Rhetoric-as-Being
    1. The “Problem” of Egyptian Myth
    2. Archival Knowledge and the Primordial Rhetorical Goddess
    3. Preceptive and Generative Design
    4. Seshat as Mediating Rhetorical Agent
  11. Chapter 4: Thoth and the Relational Nature of Egyptian Rhetoric
    1. Thoth in Egypt as the Messenger and Expression of Relational Rhetoric
    2. Prayers and Hymns to Thoth and the Haremhab Scroll
    3. Thoth’s Egyptian Identity as Narrative Exemplar
    4. Magic and Thoth’s Rhetorical Role
    5. The Long Afterlife of Thoth
  12. Chapter 5: The Beginnings of Rhetorical Myth in Ancient Greece
    1. The Derveni Papyrus, Prodicus of Ceos, and Anthropogenic Theogony
    2. Isocrates, Rhetorical Myth, and the Busiris
    3. Plato’s Protagoras and Theuth
  13. Chapter 6: Plato, Atlantean Rhetoric, Mythic σχῆμα (Schema), and the Speeches of Critias
    1. Plato’s Myths and the Timaeus-Critias in Rhetorical Theory
    2. Timaeus, the Priest of Sais, and skema muthos
    3. Atlantis as a Skema for a Scriptocentric and Rhetorical Social Order
    4. Atlantis as a Relational Rhetorical Myth
  14. Conclusion
  15. Acknowledgments
  16. Notes
    1. Introduction: Rhetoric, Myth, and Rhetorical Myth
    2. Chapter 1: Nisaba and the Identification of Sumerian Rhetoric
    3. Chapter 2: Sumerian Narrative Myth and the Relational Nature of Rhetoric in the Aratta Epics
    4. Chapter 5: The Beginnings of Rhetorical Myth in Ancient Greece
    5. Chapter 6: Plato, Atlantean Rhetoric, Mythic σχῆμα (Schema), and the Speeches of Critias
    6. Conclusion: An Apologia for the Persistently Magical
  17. Bibliography
  18. Index

Index

Page 204 →Page 205 →Page numbers in italic refer to figures.

  • aboriginal Australian cultures, rhetorical myth systems in, 14–15, 19, 179
  • abstractions, 3, 12, 16; in Egyptian myth, 80, 82–83, 107; and relational ontology, 17, 18
  • Abu Simbel, 139
  • Abu Sulabik, 34
  • “Adapa and the South Wind,” 78
  • adjective, 135
  • Aegyptica (Diodorus Siculus), 125
  • Akkadian culture: creation mythology, 99; gods, 70; specialized terminology in writing, 32
  • Alcheringa (dialect), 14
  • Altenmüller, H., 77, 78, 90
  • Amarna, Records Office in, 78
  • Amendola, D., 26
  • Amenhotep III, 95
  • Amenwahsu (chief scribe), 89
  • Ames, R. T., 69
  • Ammon (god), 144
  • analogical function of myth, 69–74
  • analogical metaphors, 42–43, 67; by Aristotle, 157–59; in Enmerkar and the Lord of Aratta, 52, 55; function of, 11; myth as, 153–54; for the power of rhetorical education, 72. See also specific myths
  • analogy as primary pedagogical tool, 66–67
  • analytical abstraction, 83
  • The Ancient Egyptian Book of Thoth, 119
  • ancient Near East, 54; cuneiform schools in, 78
  • An (god), 25, 45
  • anthropomorphic metaphor(s): metaphorical anthromorphic expression of Nisaba, 44–45; Sumerian, 28–31
  • anthropomorphic theogony, 132–34
  • anthropomorphism: anthromorphic expressions of rhetoric and myths in Egypt, 73–74; of deities in Sumerian myths, 28–31; of deities in traditional Greek myth, 132–34; in Orphic poetry, 137; Seshat’s act as anthropomorphic figure, 96
  • anthropomorphized rhetorical exempla, 67–68
  • Anzu Bird, 70
  • Appearance and Reality (Bradley), 18
  • appropriation of mythic exempla, 147
  • “A Praise Poem of Lipit-Eshtar (Lipit-Eshtar B),” 44
  • “A Prayer of General Haremhab” statue, 110
  • Aratta, lord of, 32, 52, 57
  • Aratta epics. See Enmerkar and the Lord of Aratta
  • architecture: design and inscription, 91–93; and writing, interrelatedness, 94; as written rhetoric, 36–45
  • archival knowledge: Nisaba’s, 20–21, 23, 24, 26, 27–28, 30–31, 39, 42, 43, 67, 85, 86, 89, 148; Seshat’s, 81–82, 85–88, 89–90, 95, 99
  • Aristotle, 5–6, 11, 155; analogical metaphors, 157–59; definition of rhetoric, Page 206 →46; Metaphysics, 157; Poetics, 67; On Rhetoric, 158, 166; Topica, 155; use of σχῆμα term, 157
  • Armenian connection to Sumeria, 41
  • Armenian myth, 179
  • ars or scientia, 134
  • Assmann, J., 76, 122; explanation on Egyptian conceptual expression, 84; mythemic analysis to Egyptian myth, 107; on Seshat, 80, 81–83
  • Assur (god), 25
  • Assyrian cuneiform, 42
  • Assyriologists, 67
  • astronomical knowledge, 28; Seshat’s, 93
  • Athena’s armor as skematic analogy, 157–58
  • Atlantis narrative in Critias, 151–53; before-and-after narrative structure, 160–61; cultural maturity defined by writing, 162–63, 164–65; integration of all three rhetorical genres in civic life, 166–67; persuasion as control: preliterate vs. literate agency, 165–66; as political-rhetorical argument, 153–56; practical demonstration of myth as rhetorical technology, 168–69; as a relational rhetorical myth, 169–72; relationship between memory and writing, 164–65, 168; as a skema for a scriptocentric and rhetorical social order, 160–69; writing as intergenerational rhetorical action, 160–62. See also Timaeus-Critias
  • Atran, S., 18
  • Atum, 76
  • Austro-aboriginal myths, 14–15, 19, 179
  • autonomy of ideas, 19
  • Averbeck, R. E., 37, 38, 42, 69
  • Babylonian culture, 27
  • Babylonian Expedition to Nippur III, 51
  • Baines, J., 75, 76, 78, 80, 82, 83, 92, 107, 108
  • before-and-after narrative structure, 160–62
  • being-as-rhetoric, 96
  • Bestock, L., 97
  • Bird-David, N., 18
  • Blank, T., 136
  • blasphemers, 138
  • The Book of Going Forth by Day, 75
  • The Book of the Dead, 116–18
  • The Book of Thoth, 20, 118–22, 145, 149
  • Booth, W., 10
  • Bortolani, L. M., 119
  • Boyer, P., 18
  • Bradley, F. H., 18
  • Brisson, L., 154
  • Brisson, T., 154
  • Bronze Age collapse, 74
  • Brunner, H., 78
  • Brunner-Traut, E., 80
  • Budde, D., 77, 80, 86, 93, 95, 97, 98, 99
  • “The Building of Ninĝirsu’s Temple,” 36, 39, 43
  • Burkert, W., 184n5 (chapter 5)
  • Busiris (Isocrates) as multi-layered critique, 135–41
  • Campbell, K. K., 5, 17, 45
  • Cangjie, myth of, 177–78
  • Carnap, R., 16, 18
  • Cassirer, E., 7–8
  • categorical inquiries, 16
  • Celestial Bark, Thoth’s role in, 112
  • Chassinat, E., 99
  • Cherniss, H., 154
  • “The Choice of Heracles,” 133–34
  • Cicero, 47, 56, 70, 155; De Finibus, 184n3 (chapter 5); De Inventione (1.1), 155; De Inventione (I), 135; De Rep., 184n3 (chapter 5); Vitruvius De Architectura (II), 135
  • Page 207 →circle as all-encompassing skema, 158
  • “civilizing force,” 70
  • Coffin Texts, 96, 97, 98, 99, 122
  • Cole, T., 7, 134–35, 141
  • collective forgetfulness, 164
  • communal persuasion, 70, 71
  • comparativism, 45–46
  • conceptual identity, 94, 122
  • conceptual space for rhetorical activity, 23, 87
  • constellation formations, 81
  • constitutional writing and political stability, 161–62
  • contextual knowledge for meaning, 65
  • continuity as rhetorical function, 160–62
  • Copeland, R., 2
  • Coptic calendar, 104
  • Coptic Christianity, 119
  • Corax, myths of, 7
  • Covino, W. A., 9
  • Critias narrative. See Atlantis narrative in Critias; Timaeus-Critias
  • cultural memory of writing, 160, 162, 163, 168, 170
  • cultural metaphors, 43
  • cultural preeminence of Sumeria, 68
  • cultural spaces, 173
  • cuneiform writing, 26, 35, 41; characters, 33; inscriptions, 43; literature, 54; schools, 78; signs, 63, 78; source, 31; symbol for inim, 56–57
  • Daoist literature, 69
  • De Finibus (Cicero), 184n3 (chapter 5)
  • De Inventione (1.1) (Cicero), 155
  • De Inventione (I) (Cicero), 135
  • Deir el-Bahari, Temple of Hatshepsut at, 98
  • deity(ies): as conceptual maps, 80, 82; personifications for defining rhetoric, 24–25; Seshat as scribal deity, 76–78; in Sumerian myths, 28–31; Thoth as messenger, 107–8; Thoth as self-generated, 116; in traditional Greek myth, 132–34
  • Delnero, P., 183n1 (chapter 2)
  • Democritus, 135
  • De Oratore (Cicero), 56
  • De Rep. (Cicero), 184n3 (chapter 5)
  • Derveni papyrus, 128–31
  • dialectical transition, Thoth in, 118
  • dialogic intergenerational cultural memory, 162
  • didactic role of rhetorical myths, 4, 5, 7, 10, 52–53, 67, 71, 136, 138
  • Dieleman, J., 122, 123
  • disposition: cultural, 79; Enmerkar myth as rhetorical contest over, 67; inim’s grammatical, 62, 65; rhetorical, 147
  • disputations, 54–55
  • divination in Mesopotamia, 27–28. See also Nisaba of Eres (goddess)
  • divinatory practices, 31
  • divine anthropomorphism: critique of, 136; Sumerian, 28–31; in traditional Greek myth, 132–34
  • divine personification, 28, 99
  • divine/pure language beyond writing, 67–68
  • ‘divine speech,’ 122
  • Doreal, M., 126
  • Doty, W. G., 11, 183n2 (introduction)
  • dream interpreter, 42
  • the Dreamtime, 14
  • dug (acts of speech), 63–64
  • dugud (mouth), 63
  • Dumuzid, 68
  • Edfou Texts, Volume VI and VIII (Chassinat), 99
  • Edfu, library of, 86, 97
  • edubba (a scribal school), 71
  • Page 208 →Egypt/Egyptians: cultural and graphic exchange with Sumer, 78–79; difference with Greeks, 163; exempla in, 13; in Greek rhetorical consciousness, 139–40; vs. Greek theological models, 136–37; kingship, primary occupation of, 92; limitations of myth, 80–84; ontological approaches to rhetoric, 19; as recurring Platonic concern, 140, 146; scribes, 78; sources, medical texts in, 69–70; textual endurance vs. Greek oral fragility, 161–62; worldview, 120; written Egyptian vs. oral Greek, 160. See also Seshat; Thoth in Egypt
  • The Egyptian Book of the Dead (Faulkner, Goelet, and Von Dassow), 75
  • Egyptophilia of Plato, 140
  • Eighteenth Dynasty of Egypt (1550–1292 BCE), 78, 110
  • eikos muthos, Timaeus as, 154–55
  • eloquence, 7, 8, 20, 47, 82, 96–101, 149, 178
  • Emelianov, V. V., 43–44
  • Emerald Tablet of Thoth, 125
  • The Emerald Tablets of Thoth the Atlantean (Doreal), 126
  • encomiastic display, 138
  • engravings, 77, 81, 93, 99
  • Enki (Lord of abundance), 36, 38, 39, 53
  • Enlil (chief god), 34, 70
  • En-lil (god), 25
  • Enmerkar and En-suhgir-ana, 57
  • Enmerkar and the Lord of Aratta, 32, 47; contextual background, 50, 52–56; as illustration of inim, rhetoric, and relational ontology, 56–60; rhetorical function of the Enmerkar cycle, 66–68; rhetorical nature of human–divine communication, 60–63; sign, word, and writing, 63–66; writing as rhetorical technology in, 70
  • Enmerkar (Lord of Uruk), 41, 50, 52, 53, 55, 57, 58–59, 60, 61, 62, 67, 68, 149, 184n2 (chapter 2)
  • Ennead, 104, 108, 112, 124
  • Enos, R. L., 8, 26
  • En-suhgir- ana (sorcerer), 59
  • Ensuhkeshdanna of Aratta, 57, 58, 59
  • entia, 11, 13, 43, 57, 115, 117, 176, 177, 179
  • Enuma Anu Enlil, 28
  • Ephorus, 135
  • Epicurus, 135
  • epideictic rhetoric: in civic proceedings, 166; display as marketing tool, 133–34; praise through civilizational association, 135; temporal synthesis in, 167
  • epithets, 93, 94, 97; Egyptian, 77, 80, 81, 82, 86, 87, 88, 93, 94, 96, 97; Seshat’s collective, 96; Sumerian, 23, 27; Thoth’s, 118, 122
  • Eres, city of, 59
  • Etemenanki, tower of, 52
  • Eucken, C., 137, 140
  • Euphrates, 1, 57
  • exempla, 174; anthropomorphized rhetorical, 67–68; appropriation of mythic, 147; in Egypt, 13; in Graeco-Roman rhetoric, 13; rhetorical, 132; sophistic shift to mortal/demi-mortal, 132–33
  • exemplars: narrative, 118–22; rhetorical, 21, 39, 77, 93, 96
  • exemplary, rhetorical myth as, 69–74
  • Eyre, C., 78
  • Fei, Han, 177
  • female martial equality, 157–58
  • figurative language, 35, 84
  • “folk theory of relation,” 18
  • Fourth Dynasty, 92
  • Fox, M. V., 9
  • Frankfurter, D., 120
  • Page 209 →Frentz, T. S., 11
  • Freud, S., 2
  • futurity. See human futurity
  • Gardiner, A. H., 88, 89
  • Gencarella, S. O., 7
  • generative designs, Seshat’s role in, 90–96
  • George, A. R., 27
  • Gill, C., 154, 158
  • Glassner, J.-J., 29, 30, 35, 44, 45–46
  • god-as-function, 112
  • goddess-as-concept, 100
  • gods-as-concept, 82, 84
  • Goebs, K., 76, 107, 108
  • golden tablet as rhetorical archive, 166
  • gong (public good), 177
  • Goody, J., 26
  • Gorgias, 128, 132, 165
  • Graeco-Egyptian magical literature, 104
  • Graeco-Roman rhetoric, 13, 27, 35, 54, 101, 115
  • Graham, A. C., 69
  • Great Pyramid of Giza, 126
  • Greece: continuous contact with Egyptians, 104, 139; Egyptian vs. Greek theological models, 136–37; Ptolemaic conquerors, 81; rhetoric, 16–18, 19; writing systems, 9; written Egyptian vs. oral Greek, 160. See also Atlantis narrative in Critias; Plato; rhetorical myth in ancient Greece, beginning of
  • “the Greek miracle” of Renan, 45
  • Griswold, C. L., Jr., 154, 155, 158–59
  • Grossman, R., 16
  • Gudea as a cultural hero, 36, 38–41, 43
  • gu-de (“to say”), 24
  • gu-sum (Sumerian specialized terminology in writing), 32
  • gu verb, 59, 60, 63, 184n2 (chapter 2). See also inim verb; language; writing
  • Hall, D. L., 69
  • Hallo, W. W., 26–27, 54
  • Hanfeizi (primary source in myth of Cangjie), 177
  • Haremhab, 110, 112, 114, 115; showcasing relational qualities of Thoth’s rhetorical nature, 112–13; statue of, 111
  • Haskins, E., 8
  • Hatshepsut, 94; Temple of, 81, 95
  • Havelock, E. A., 7, 26
  • Hecataeus of Miletus, 139
  • Hellenic culture, 100, 122, 135, 136, 139
  • Hemelrijk, E., 104
  • Heraclides Ponticus, 135
  • hermeneia (ἑρμηνεία), 125, 143
  • Hermes (god), 101, 104, 107, 119, 125, 142, 143, 145
  • Hermes Trismegistus, 104
  • Hermetic articulation of language, 143–44
  • Hesiod, 7, 8, 24, 125, 136
  • hieroglyphic signs, 78, 93, 119–20
  • Hittite instructors, 78
  • Homer, 8, 139
  • Horemheb. See Haremhab
  • horological process, 114
  • Horus (god), 107; inscriptions of, 93
  • House of Books, 86, 87
  • House of Life, 87, 88–90. See also Seshat
  • House of Wisdom, 36, 44–45. See also Nisaba of Eres (goddess)
  • Huainanzi (primary source in myth of Cangjie), 177
  • human consciousness, 38
  • human-divine communication, rhetorical nature of, 60–63
  • human futurity, 39; governed by Nisaba, 8, 30, 35, 38, 39, 45, 86; Seshat’s relationship to, 90–91, 95, 98, 101
  • human rhetorical judgment, 125
  • “Hymn of Gudea,” 35
  • “Hymn to King Isbi-Erra of Isin,” 35
  • Page 210 →Hymn to Nanshe, 36
  • hypodeictic rhetoric, 2, 15, 55, 136, 147–48
  • ibises, mummified, 103–4
  • iconicity, 80, 82
  • imitation (mimesis), 154–56
  • Inanna (goddess), 50, 52, 57, 58–59, 60, 61, 62; as complementary rhetorical functions, 67, 68; story of Lugalbanda and the Anzud bird, 72
  • Ingold, T., 18
  • inim (“speech”), 24
  • inim verb: vs. dug: complex rhetoric vs. simple speech, 63–64; illustration of, 56–58; interplay of word, sign, speech, and writing, 63–66; in relational rhetorical act, 60, 61–63; The Return of Lugalbanda, 69–74. See also gu verb; language; writing
  • inscriptions, 85, 86, 87, 89; and architectural design, 91–93; at Edfu, 95; Haremhab, 110, 112; from the Ptolemaic period, 97; and re-inscription of cultural values, 162
  • Instituio Oratoria (Quintilian), 184n3 (chapter 5)
  • interconnectedness of language, 87
  • intergenerational cultural memory, 162
  • intergenerational means of transmitting knowledge, 165
  • intergenerational nature of writing, 161–62
  • intergenerational persuasion, 164
  • intergenerational rhetoric, 148
  • interspecies communication, 59–60
  • inventio, 101
  • invocations (āšipu), 34
  • Isis, 143
  • Isocrates, 70; Busiris, 135–41; critiques Polycrates, 138; mythic distinction, 135–36; Panathenaicus, 135; Panegyricus, 140; To Philip, 135. See also Prodicus of Ceos
  • Jarratt, S., 8
  • Jasnow, R., 118–19, 121
  • Johandi, A., 54
  • Johnstone, C., 8–9, 25
  • Jung, K., 2
  • Karshner, E., 76
  • Kees, H., 80
  • Kennedy, G. A., 9
  • “Kesh Hymn,” 34
  • Ki (god), 45
  • Kish, 50
  • Klein, J., 34, 44
  • knowledge: astronomical, 28, 165; contextual knowledge for meaning, 65; mediated, 121, 123–25, 147; myth and writing as parallel systems, 164–65; numinous knowledge, dispersed, 10, 148–49; relational, 122; unmediated vs. mediated, 123–25; written, 148, 162, 164–65. See also archival knowledge
  • Koolmatrie, J., 14
  • Kulab, lord of, 64
  • Kulturgeschichte accounts as rhetorical genre, 134–35
  • Kulturgeschichte myth of Protagoras, 141
  • “The Lady of Scripture and Lady of the Words of God,” 94
  • Laertius, D., 134, 184n3 (chapter 5)
  • language, 69; adjective, 135; conventional development of, 142–44; to correct wrongdoing between parties, 112–13; as a determiner, 112; divine/pure, 67–68; figurative, 35, 84; Hermetic articulation of, 143–44; interconnectedness of, 87; synecdochal language development, 143–44; unmediated language Page 211 →as chaos, 123–25. See also gu verb; inim verb; noun; writing
  • lapis lazuli tablet, 32, 34, 44, 90
  • Leszl, 155
  • Letter VII (Plato), 168, 170, 184n3 (chapter 5)
  • Levin, S. R., 158
  • Lévi-Strauss, C., 2, 8, 76
  • libraries in Ancient Egypt, 86, 87
  • Lichtheim, M., 108, 112, 121
  • Liddel, P., 26
  • Lincoln, B., 174, 175
  • Lipson, C. S., 9, 76
  • Livingstone, N., 135, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141
  • logos, 35; Egyptian Hermes as allegorically synonymous with, 125; Haskins on, 8; numinous power of, 128; as proportional/analogical, 158–59; rhetorics existence as, 130; skema of a, 147, 151–61, 164, 170
  • Lugalbanda (Enmerkar’s son), 57
  • Lugalbanda in the Wilderness, 57
  • Lunheng (primary source in myth of Cangjie), 177
  • ma’at, 80, 90; reification of, 87; relation to language as a determiner, 112; Thoth as “determiner” of, 113
  • Ma’at (goddess and concept), 76
  • magic, 82–83; and Thoth’s rhetorical role, 122–25
  • magical rituals, 99
  • Martin, G. T., 115–16
  • McAdon, B., 46
  • meaning-making, 10–12, 15, 17, 45; by Nisaba, 34–35
  • mediated knowledge, 121, 123–25, 147
  • Meier, S. A., 74
  • Memnosyne, 164
  • memoria, 46, 101
  • memory: cultural, of writing, 160, 162, 163, 168, 170; as foundation of collective reasoning, 164–65; and writing, 164–65, 168. See also Atlantis narrative in Critias
  • Memphite Theology, 122
  • Mesopotamia: cultures, 25; divination in, 27–28; motifs, 78. See also Nisaba of Eres (goddess)
  • metaphors: anthropomorphic, Sumerians, 28–31, 44–45; construction of the temple of Ninĝirsu as, 42–43; cultural, 43; function of, 85; House of Wisdom as, 44–45. See also analogical metaphors
  • Metaphysics (Aristotle), 157
  • metonymy, 67
  • mihiltum (Akkadian specialized terminology in writing), 32
  • moralia, 154
  • Morgan, K., 153, 156
  • Muhlenstein, K., 83–84
  • Murphy, J. J., 7
  • muthos/logos paradox: skema of a muthos resolving the, 156–60; tension of ancient, 153–56
  • Muzeum Narodowe Warszawa, 41
  • Myers, B. R. H., 153
  • Myers, F. R., 14
  • mythemes, 13, 53–54, 70; in an Egyptian context, 106–8; related to birds and netting, 121
  • mythic figures as conceptual preservation, 24–25, 26
  • mythic forms of rhetorical theory, 174
  • mythography, 13, 174
  • mythologizing as rhetorical act, 12
  • mythopoetic: consciousness, 9; descriptor, 29; discourse, 8; preconceptual eloquence, 7
  • mythos and logos, 8
  • myths: as advanced curriculum, 66; conveys truth propositions, 151; of Enmerkar or Setne, 170; as formative theory, 12; as independent truth-conveying Page 212 →power, 153; in writing, 9, 47, 164–65. See also specific myths
  • Nabu (god), 27, 73–74
  • Naddaf, G., 157, 165
  • Naneferkaptah, 123–25, 149
  • Naqada III culture, 78
  • narrative rhetorical myths, 53–54
  • Nativity Hall, 98
  • nativity room of the Temple of Luxor, 98
  • Naucratis, 139, 144, 184n2 (chapter 5)
  • Naveh, D., 18
  • Nebuchadnezzar, 74
  • Neo-Assyrian period, 28
  • Neo-Babylonian school tablets, 70–71
  • Nestle, W., 26
  • netting in the context of rhetoric, 34, 121–22, 149
  • Nietzsche, F., 2
  • Ninduba (technical god), 37, 38, 68
  • Ninĝirsu (god), 36, 38, 39
  • Ninurta (warrior god), 70
  • Nippur, 50, 71, 183n1 (chapter 2)
  • Nisaba and Seshat: distinction between, 100–101; similarities between, 78–79, 85, 89, 146
  • Nisaba of Eres (goddess): anthropomorphic expression of, 28–31, 44–45; archival knowledge of, 20–21, 23, 24, 26, 27–28, 30–31, 39, 42, 43, 67, 85, 86, 89, 148; as causative force, 35–36, 68; as complementary rhetorical functions, 66, 67; as a contrastive identification of rhetoric, 45–47; decline in worship of, 74; as evidence of pre-Greek rhetorical theory (2600 BCE), 23–24; as first “ontological identification” of rhetoric, 24–25; the goddess-as-knowledge- of- means, 56; House of Wisdom, 44–45; as liminal dream messenger, 36–43; magical trappings of, 90; as mediator between human and divine, 35–36; as net maker, 34–35; Nisaba-as-concept, 18, 36–38; Nisaba-as-goddess, 18; Nisaba-as-sign, 38–44; opens “the House of Wisdom” to Enmerkar, 52–53; rhetorical agency of, 100; rhetorical counsel to Enmerkar, 60–61; rhetoric-as-concept, 53; role as patroness of writing, 32; as symbol organizer, 34–35; as writing goddess, 23, 25–27, 44. See also Sumer/Sumerians
  • noun: for rhetoric, 11, 159; μῦθος, 135. See also language
  • n’rms, 112
  • numinous knowledge, dispersed, 10, 148–49
  • occult traditions, 30, 104, 125–26, 130
  • Old Kingdom, 86, 95, 100
  • Ong, W. J., 26
  • onomastic fallacy, 6
  • On Rhetoric (Aristotle), 158, 166
  • ontological defense of divine virtue, 137
  • Orpheus, 128, 129, 130; Orphic grotesqueries and Egyptian propriety, 138; Orphic myth, 140; Orphic poetry, 137; Orphic theogony, 128–29; Orphism, 136, 138
  • orthocalligraphy, 32
  • Ortiz, M., 9
  • “other,” 71
  • P. Cairo 30646, 123
  • Panathenaicus (Isocrates), 135
  • panegyric displays, 136
  • Panegyricus, 140, 141
  • Papillon, 134, 135, 136, 138, 155
  • papyrus: Derveni papyrus, 128–31; papyrus-based scribal activity, 85–86, 93, 99
  • papyrus (goddess), 79
  • Page 213 →paradeigma, 155
  • pedagogical texts, 55
  • Pernot, 137
  • personal agency in transitional processes, 118
  • personifications: of deities for defining rhetoric, 24–25; divine, 28, 99; of virtue and vice, 133–34. See also ma’at; Nisaba of Eres (goddess)
  • persuasion, 17; of animals to speak, 60; communal, 70, 71; as control, 165–66; existence within relational contexts, 71–73; intergenerational, 164; protreptic, through myth, 151
  • persuasive, conceptual hierarchy of, 68
  • Phaedrus (Plato), 16, 20, 50, 140, 145, 153, 158, 164, 168, 170, 171; myths as “mythoi” or “logoi” in, 155; Thoth’s appearance in, 123; used the word skema (σχῆμα) to condemn false rhetoric, 157
  • Phaethon myth, skema of, 162–63
  • pharoahs, 93, 94–95, 97, 98, 99; King Tutankhamun, 110
  • Philae, library of, 86
  • Philebus (Plato), 145, 146
  • Pintupi people, myth system of, 13–14, 15
  • Plato, 7, 79–80, 101, 123, 126; conceptual impact of Egyptian rhetorical theory on, 79–80; Egyptophilia of, 140; myth as rhetorical tool, not just content, 151–52; myths and the Timaeus-Critias in rhetorical theory, 152–56; ontological inquiry, 16; Philebus, 145, 146; Protagoras, 7, 135, 141–44; Republic, 140; Republic X, 155; Seventh Letter, 168, 170, 184n3 (chapter 5); Statesman, 155; Theaetetus, 149; Theuth, 137, 144–49; Timaeus, 151, 152–53; uses the Egyptian priest’s skema concept, 152–53. See also Atlantis narrative in Critias; Phaedrus
  • Plutarch, 155
  • Pohlenz, M., 140–41
  • Polycrates, 136, 138, 139
  • Porphyry, 159
  • Posidinius, 135
  • “Praise be to Nisaba!,” 57
  • “The Prayer to Thoth,” 108–10
  • pre-anthropomorphic divinity in mythic form, 157
  • preceptive designs, Seshat’s role in, 94–96
  • Priest of Sais, 154–55, 159–60, 162, 163, 164, 171
  • Proclus, late antique recognition, 159
  • Prodicus of Ceos: influence on rhetorical tradition, 131–34, 135–36, 138, 140, 141. See also Isocrates
  • Promethean myth, 141–43
  • propaideutics, 137, 140
  • Protagoras (Plato), 7, 135, 141–44
  • protreptic persuasion through myth, 151
  • Ptolemaic period, 86, 95, 97
  • Ptolemaic temple, 99
  • Ptolemy IV, 97
  • Ptolemy X, 99–100
  • Pyramid Texts, 80
  • Queen’s Red Chapel, 94
  • Quintilian, 13, 156; Instituio Oratoria, 184n3 (chapter 5)
  • Rabel, R. J., 155
  • Ra (god), 112, 144
  • raiment: celestial, 95; starry, of Seshat, 90–91
  • Ramayana (Hindu epic), 178
  • Ramesses II, 105
  • Ramesses IV, 88–89
  • Rashwan, H., 9–10
  • Rashwan, M., 9
  • Redford, D. B., 87–88
  • Page 214 →reed stylus, 105
  • reification: of ma’at, 87; of power structures, 175
  • relational commonality, 70
  • relational identity, Thoth, 121
  • relational knowledge, 122
  • relational meaning, 59, 122, 124
  • relational mediator, 123
  • relational ontology, 16, 17–19; Egyptian, of rhetoric, 110, 112–18; illustration of, 56–60; rhetoric as, 123–25; Seshat, 92–93
  • Republic (Plato), 140, 146
  • Republic X (Plato), 155
  • Re (sun god), 99, 112, 114
  • The Return of Lugalbanda, 57; analogical function of myth in, 69–74
  • reveal (μηνύουσιν), 146
  • Rhetor, Menander, 137
  • rhetoric, 115; in antiquity, recorded emergence of, 3–4; architecture as written, 36–45; Aristotle’s definition of, 46; as conflict resolution, 115; as cosmic alignment (Kairos), 31–34; Graeco-Roman, 13, 27, 35, 54, 101, 115; history of, 5–10; hypodeictic, 2, 15, 55, 136, 147–48; intergenerational, 148; netting in the context of, 34, 121–22, 149; noun for, 11, 159; onomastic fallacy, 6; ontology of, 12–15. See also epideictic rhetoric; mythic rhetoric; Thoth in Egypt; specific myths
  • rhetorical agency, 11, 53, 81, 180; of Nisaba, 100–101; of Seshat, 100–101
  • rhetorical agent, 23; Seshat as mediating, 96–101
  • rhetorical commonalities, 12–13
  • rhetorical consciousness: of ancient Athens, 138; Egypt in Greek, 139–40
  • rhetorical education, 72–73, 109, 136
  • rhetorical enlightenment, 54
  • rhetorical exempla, 132; anthropomorphized, 66–67
  • rhetorical exemplars, 21, 39, 77, 93, 96
  • rhetorical identity, 94
  • rhetorical latency, 64
  • rhetorical meaning, 65, 121
  • rhetorical myths, 174; as analogical and exemplary, 69–74; categorical nature, 13; defined, 10–11; development of, 2–3; didactic role of, 4, 5, 7, 10, 52–53, 67, 71, 136, 138; interrelational presence of concepts, 17–19; mythologizing as rhetorical act, 12; ontological nature of, 15–17; preceptual-didactic function, 10; systems in aboriginal Australian cultures, 14; topoi as ontological categories, 10, 11
  • rhetorical myth in ancient Greece, beginning of: anthropomorphic theogony, 132–34; Busiris as multi-layered critique, 135–41; Derveni papyrus, 128–31; Isocrates’s mythic distinction, 135–36; Kulturgeschichte accounts as rhetorical genre, 134–35; Orphic theogony, 128–29; Plato’s Protagoras, 141–44; Plato’s Theuth, 140, 144–49; Prodicus of Ceos, influence of, 131–34, 135–36, 138, 140, 141
  • rhetorical nature of human–divine communication, 60–63
  • rhetorical precepts, 93, 98
  • rhetorical relationship to the past, 162–63
  • rhetorical technology, 39–40
  • rhetoric-as-concept, 92; Seshat, 98
  • Rhetoric Before and Beyond the Greeks (Lipson & Binkley), 9
  • rhetorike, 6, 16
  • Rigveda, 178
  • Ritner, R. K., 97
  • ritual as embodied rhetoric, 167
  • Rochberg, F., 29
  • Page 215 →The Routledge Handbook of Comparative World Rhetorics (Lloyd), 9
  • The Routledge Handbook of Descriptive Rhetorical Studies and World Languages (Wei & Schnell), 9
  • Rowe, C., 154
  • sacred writings of Egyptian civilizations, 163
  • Sandywell, B., 173
  • Sansone, 133–34
  • Saqqara, 110; archaeological excavations at, 103; elements of the sign at, 78; Horemhab’s tomb at, 115
  • Saraswati (goddess), 178
  • Schiappa, E., 7
  • Schott, S., 80
  • scribal curriculum, 78
  • scribal deity, Seshat as, 76–78
  • scribal education, 53, 55, 66, 71–73, 109–10
  • scribal writing: on papyrus, 93; Thoth as a patron of, 106
  • Sefati, Y., 34
  • self-generated deity, Thoth as, 116
  • semiotic inferences, 149
  • semiotic relationships through writing, 64–66
  • Seshat and Nisaba: distinction between, 100–101; similarities between, 78–79, 85, 89, 146
  • Seshat (goddess), 27, 73, 74; archival knowledge of, 81–82, 85–88, 89–90, 95, 99; as central figure to the rhetorical culture of Egypt, 76–78; as a goddess of independent origin, 78; House of Life, 88–89; identification of rhetoric-as-being, 79–80; as mediating rhetorical agent, 96–101; mythic identity-as-concept, 85; relationship to rhetoric derives, 85–90; role in generative designs, 90–96; role in preceptive designs, 94–96; Seshat-as-concept, 82, 84; as writing goddess, 76–78, 93–94
  • Sethe, K., 80
  • Setne, Prince, 123–24
  • Setne and the Book of Thoth, 123
  • Seventh Letter, 146, 184n3 (chapter 5)
  • sexagesimal trigonometry, 11
  • Shulgi B hymn, 43–44
  • Shuowen Jiezi (primary source in myth of Cangjie), 177
  • Siculus, D., 134, 184n3 (chapter 5); naturalistic account, 142–44
  • signs: futurity and divination, 30–31, 44–45; hieroglyphic sign designating “Seshat,” 78; implicating rhetorical matters, 28; nature of, 17; Nisaba-as-sign, 38–39, 41–42, 43–44; order on, 38; stylus as, 36–37; written, 32. See also inim verb
  • similes, 84
  • si (self-interest), 177
  • skema, 144, 150; as analogical rhetorical principle, 167; as central organizing concept, 162–63; to describe “imitation” ascribed to various forms of speech, 155–56; as logocentric schema, 151; of a logos, 147; nature of the term, 153–54; of Phaethon myth, 162–63
  • skema muthos, 153–56; resolving the muthos/logos paradox, 156–60
  • Smelik, K., 104
  • social cohesion as rhetorical telos, 113
  • social mobility, 109–10
  • social relations, 69, 80, 82, 87, 113
  • Socrates, 140, 145–46, 147–48, 170
  • solid-surface inscriptions, 79
  • Solon, 152; ignorance of true antiquity, 162, 163, 164
  • sophistic shift to mortal/demi-mortal exempla, 132–33
  • sorcerers, 59–60
  • Page 216 →speech and divine power, 97–98
  • Spell of Nudimmud, 52, 53, 54–55, 67
  • Spencer, J., 15
  • Stanner, W. E. H., 14, 15
  • stars as divine writing, 32–34
  • Statesman (Plato), 155
  • statue of Ramesses, 90
  • Strato of Lampsacus, 135
  • stylus, 31, 36–37, 39–40, 44, 88, 90, 93, 105; Seshat with, 93; and tablet as rhetorical technology, 37–38, 39, 45
  • Sumer/Sumerians: anthropomorphizing their deities, 28–31; concept of rhetoric for, 16–17, 18; cultural and graphic exchange with Egypt, 78–79; exempla in, 13; nature of divine agency in, 25–27; worldview of, 35. See also Nisaba of Eres (goddess)
  • symbolic expression, 4, 5, 14, 15
  • symbolic mediation, 148
  • synecdochal language development, 143–44
  • synecdoche, 67
  • tablets: as a cultural symbol, 32; Enmerkar, 50; lapis lazuli, 32, 34, 44, 90; literary, 51; Neo-Babylonian school, 70–71; and stylus as rhetorical technology, 37–38, 39, 45
  • Tablets of Destiny, 27, 33–35; theft of, 70
  • The Tale of Setne, 122–23, 145, 146
  • telos, 80
  • temple: of Edfu, 77, 99; at Hermopolis Magnae, 121; hymns, 36; inscriptions, 99; of Ninĝirsu, 41, 42; precincts, 93, 94
  • Temple of Hatshepsut: at Deir el-Bahari, 95; at Hathor, 81
  • Temple of Luxor, Egypt, 98, 105
  • Temple of Messiamtaea, 41
  • Thamus (god), 144
  • Thamus-Ra, 144
  • Thamus-Theuth, myth in Phaedrus, 140, 153
  • Theaetetus (Plato), 149
  • Thebes, 89, 139
  • theogony of the gods, 136, 138–39
  • Theophrastus, 135
  • Theuth myth, 137, 140, 144–49, 153; Busiris’ response to, 140; critiques epistemic mediation, 148–49
  • Thirtieth Dynasty, 149
  • Thoth-Hermes, 119
  • Thoth in Egypt, 73, 76, 77, 79, 80, 86, 89, 96; as adviser and counselor, 113; aid the voyage of the pharaoh’s spirit, 98; as the “courier” of humankind, 115; Egyptian identity as narrative exemplar, 118–22; as expression of relational rhetoric, 89, 106–8; governs all relational/liminal processes, 104–6; iconography, 104; as interpreter of the two lands, 117–18; as link between Egyptian and Graeco-Roman rhetoric, 101; long afterlife of, 125–26; magic and rhetorical role of, 122–25; as messenger deity, 107–8; prayers and hymns to, 108–10; as relational rhetorical entia, 110, 112–18; scribal writing on papyrus, 93; as “writing god,” 107–8
  • Thoth in Philebus, 145–46; ontological vs. epistemological, 149
  • Thout (month), 104
  • Timaeus-Critias in rhetorical theory, 146, 152–56; parallels with Busiris, 141; Priest of Sais, 154–55, 159–60; skema muthos, 156–59. See also Atlantis narrative in Critias
  • Timaeus (Plato), 137–38, 140, 146, 151, 152–53
  • Tinney, S., 183n1 (chapter 2)
  • Tisias, myths of, 7
  • Page 217 →Tjukurrpa (dialect), 19, 179; myth and mythologizing from, 14–15
  • Tomb 111 at Thebes, 89
  • To Philip (letter by Isocrates), 135
  • Topica (Aristotle), 155
  • topoi as ontological categories, 10, 11
  • Tuna el-Gebel, archaeological excavations at, 103
  • tuparuttu (the art of writing), 32
  • turiku, 14
  • Turner, M., 156–57
  • Tyr (ancient Armenian myth), 179
  • Tzetzes, J., 125
  • unmediated language as chaos, 123–25
  • Ur, 50
  • Urgirinuna (sorcerer), 57
  • Uruk culture, 78
  • Van Dijk, J., 108
  • Vanstiphout, H., 49, 50–51, 54–55, 56
  • Vasunia, P., 139, 163
  • Veldhuis, N. C., 183n1 (chapter 2)
  • verb. See gu verb; inim verb
  • Vickers, B., 8
  • Vico, G., 2
  • Vidal-Naquet, P., 154–55
  • Vitruvius De Architectura (II) (Cicero), 135
  • Volkov, A., 69
  • von Schelling, F., 2
  • Wainwright, G. A., 90, 94
  • Walker, J., 7, 8
  • Wasef, S., 103
  • Weber, M., 88
  • Westerfield, J. T., 119
  • White, D., 155
  • Wilcke, C., 67
  • Willerslev, R., 18
  • Wise Woman Sagburu (sorceress), 57
  • writing(s): and architecture, interrelatedness, 94; as “arts of civilized states,” 162–63; constitutional, and political stability, 161–62; cultural memory of, 160, 162, 163, 168, 170; as foundation for mutual deliberation, 165–66; (grammata) of Poseidon, 166–67; as intergenerational rhetorical action, 160–62; invention in Enmerkar and the Lord of Aratta, 63–66; and memory, 164–65, 168; and myth as parallel systems, 164–65; as rhetorical technology in Enmerkar and the Lord of Aratta, 70; sacred, of Egyptian civilizations, 163; scribal, 93, 106; semiotic relationships through, 64–66. See also Atlantis narrative in Critias; Cangjie, myth of; cuneiform writing; gu verb; inim verb; language; Nisaba of Eres (goddess); noun; Seshat goddess
  • writing god, Thoth as, 107–8
  • writing goddess: Nisaba of Eres as, 23, 25–27, 44; Seshat as, 76–78, 93–94
  • written Egyptian vs. oral Greek, 160
  • written knowledge, 148, 162. See also specific myths
  • Xenophanes of Colophon, 134
  • Xenophon, 133–34
  • Xu, postface of, 178
  • Xunzi, 177
  • Yerevan, 41
  • Yona, S., 142
  • Zalta, E. N., 16
  • Zauzich, K.-T., 119
  • Zeus, 142, 147
  • Zhuangzi, 179
  • Zinn, K., 87

Annotate

Previous
© 2026 University of South Carolina
Powered by Manifold Scholarship. Learn more at
Opens in new tab or windowmanifoldapp.org