Skip to main content

Trade, Politics, and Revolution: South Carolina and Britain’s Atlantic Commerce, 1730–1790: Acknowledgments

Trade, Politics, and Revolution: South Carolina and Britain’s Atlantic Commerce, 1730–1790
Acknowledgments
    • Notifications
    • Privacy
  • Project HomeTrade, Politics, and Revolution
  • Projects
  • Learn more about Manifold

Notes

Show the following:

  • Annotations
  • Resources
Search within:

Adjust appearance:

  • font
    Font style
  • color scheme
  • Margins
table of contents
  1. Cover Page
  2. Title Page
  3. Copyright Page
  4. Dedication
  5. Contents
  6. List of Illustrations
  7. Acknowledgments
  8. Notes on the Text
  9. Chronology
  10. Dramatis Personae
  11. Introduction: “A large territory on the Atlantic Ocean, in a temperate latitude”—South Carolina and Great Britain
  12. Chapter One: “The Metropolis of South Carolina”, London Lobbying and Charles Town Commerce
    1. Mercantilism and “Interest”
    2. Defense, Rice, and the Emergence of a Carolina Lobby in London
    3. Getting into the Carolina Trade
    4. Trading in Charles Town
    5. Relocating to Britain
  13. Chapter Two: “Friends to Assist at Home”, London’s Carolina Trade in the 1740s and 1750s
    1. “Carolina merchants”: The Composition and Organization of London’s Carolina Trade
    2. “Transactions with a few well chosen Friends”: The Concentration of London’s Carolina Trade
    3. “For which this Province is Greatly Oblig’d”: London Lobbying in the Early 1740s
    4. Trade and the “National Interest”
    5. “Indefatigable in the service of this Province”: The 1748 Indigo Bounty
  14. Chapter Three: “Cankers to the Riches of a Country”?, Transatlantic Absenteeism in Colonial South Carolina
    1. Conceptions of Absenteeism in Colonial South Carolina
    2. Acquiring Lands in South Carolina
    3. Retaining Assets in South Carolina
    4. Returns on Absentee-Owned Plantations
    5. Absenteeism and Agency
  15. Chapter Four: “From Humble & Moderate Fortunes to Great Affluence”, The Transatlantic Carolina Trade and Imperial Crises
    1. “Supported by the Whole Body of Merchants in London”
    2. “The important services they have done to America in General”
    3. “Commissions & profits arising from such Trade”
    4. “Join to quench the growing Evil”
    5. “I don’t know that we have a Zealous friend or Advocate among the Merchants”
    6. “Parties in the attempt against us”
  16. Chapter Five: The Voyage of the Lord North, American Independence, Anglo-Carolinian Trade, and Unfinished Business
    1. “The usual intercourse of Commerce be again resumed”: London Merchants and Wartime Lobbying
    2. “Enjoyment on one side, and Restrictions on the other”: The Restoration of Anglo-American Trade
    3. “Commerce again shall lift her drooping head”: The Resumption of Anglo-Carolinian Trade
    4. “Members and heads of a British faction”: Anti-British Sentiment in Charleston
    5. “Manifestly far from being cordial Friends”: Echoes of Prewar Trade
    6. “After a Storm at Sea is over”: British Merchants and the Postwar Carolina Trade
    7. “No lawful impediments”: Pursuing Prewar Debts in Britain and South Carolina in the 1780s
    8. “Carolina disappointments”: Assessing the Debts in the 1790s
  17. Conclusion: “Let me have done with American lands”
  18. Abbreviations
  19. Notes
  20. Bibliography
  21. Index

Page xi →Acknowledgments

Like the business of the eighteenth-century merchants who populate this book, writing it has been a hugely rewarding enterprise. And, to push the analogy a little further, in the process I’ve run up many outstanding debts to colleagues and friends who have made the book possible.

Special thanks must go to Perry Gauci for his tireless enthusiasm, insight, and generosity. He really is a “conscientious, vigilant and accessible man of action,” as he has defined the archetypal eighteenth-century merchant. At Oxford University the Rothermere American Institute is an exceptional place to study America and its relations with the world, and it has been a wonderful academic home. I am very grateful to colleagues at the RAI for their advice and encouragement, in particular its outstanding directors Nigel Bowles and Jay Sexton, and Gareth Davies, Pekka Hämäläinen, and Stephen Tuck. Each year one of America’s great historians visits as Harmsworth Professor, and I am grateful to all of them who have shared ideas and recommendations, in particular Peter Onuf and Philip Morgan. Peter Thompson and Betty Wood also gave invaluable feedback on my thesis. Experts in British history have helped fill many gaps in my knowledge of the “mother country” and opened up new lines of enquiry, and I am especially grateful to Bob Harris, Joanna Innes, Erica Charters, Stephen Hague, and Benjamin Heller for their advice and recommendations. The camaraderie of RAI’s graduate community, especially Ken Owen, Will Pettigrew, David Sim, Joe Merton, Ursula Hackett, Tom Packer, Sebastian Page, and Steve Tuffnell, too helped make this a thoroughly enjoyable project.

I benefited from the friendliness, helpfulness, and expertise of staff in all the libraries where I spent time doing research for this project. Top of the list must be Jane Rawson and her colleagues—Judy Warden, Martin Sutcliffe, Johanna O’Connor, and Richard Purkiss—at the Vere Harmsworth Library in Oxford for tracking down books and innumerable visits to the stacks on my behalf. This book would also not have been possible without the assistance of librarians at the South Caroliniana Library in Columbia, the South Carolina Historical Society in Charleston, the South Carolina Department of Archives and History, the National Archives in London, and the Huntington Library in San Marino, California. Graham Duncan and Brian Cuthrell at the South Caroliniana, Mary Jo Fairchild at the S.C. Historical Society, and Juan Gomez at the Huntington merit special mention for making their institutions such welcoming places.

Research led me to many new and fascinating places. I’ve been blessed with great hospitality on my travels. First and foremost, Vennie Deas-Moore and Page xii →Keith Moore have been wonderful hosts, making Columbia, S.C., a home away from home; thanks too to Joe Renouard in Charleston, and to Louise McLaren and Phil Killingley, and Gavin Pape for accommodation and good company on visits to the National Archives in southwest London.

Financially, grants from the Arts and Humanities Research Council made my research possible, supplemented by an invaluable writing-up scholarship from the Rothermere American Institute. I am grateful to both institutions for their assistance, and at the RAI for the support and encouragement of Vyvyan and Alexandra Harmsworth, David and Maria Willetts, Nicolas Ollivant, and the anonymous donor who funded my writing-up grant. Travel awards from Lincoln College, Oxford; the College of Charleston; and the Huntington Library have been vital in supporting visits to far-flung archives.

I was honored to receive the Hines Prize for the manuscript of this book in 2015. I am very grateful to Carolina Lowcountry and the Atlantic World Program at the College of Charleston and the prize committee for reading my work and awarding me the prize, and in particular to Samuel Hines for so generously creating the prize. Thanks go also to Bill Adams, Linda Fogle and their colleagues at the University of South Carolina Press and especially the two anonymous readers whose insightful comments on the manuscript have much improved it.

Friends have listened patiently and with apparent interest to my stories of historical detective work. A special mention here to Seth and Kate Sinclair, Robert and Laura Burley, and David and Carin Peller-Semmens. Louisa Hotson injected love, laughter, and irrepressible enthusiasm into the final push. Finally, and above all, the love and support of my parents, Rhys and Susan David, have been instrumental. Early trips to castles, churches, and museums laid the foundations for a fascination with history and proved to be time very well spent. For that, and for so much else, I will always be grateful.

Annotate

Next Chapter
Notes on the Text
PreviousNext
© 2018 University of South Carolina
Powered by Manifold Scholarship. Learn more at
Opens in new tab or windowmanifoldapp.org