Skip to main content

Affective Rhetorics: Reembodying Circulation in Digital Spaces: Index

Affective Rhetorics: Reembodying Circulation in Digital Spaces
Index
  • Show the following:

    Annotations
    Resources
  • Adjust appearance:

    Font
    Font style
    Color Scheme
    Light
    Dark
    Annotation contrast
    Low
    High
    Margins
  • Search within:
    • My Notes + Comments
    • Notifications
    • Privacy
  • Project HomeAffective Rhetorics
  • Projects
  • Learn more about Manifold

Notes

table of contents
  1. Cover Page
  2. Title Page
  3. Copyright Page
  4. Dedication
  5. Contents
  6. List of Illustrations
  7. Series Editor’s Preface
  8. Preface
  9. Introduction. Bodies in Motion
    1. A Transnational Feminist Rhetorical Framing of Circulation, Affect, and Neoliberalism
    2. Trajectory of Affective Rhetorics
    3. Affective Transformations: Why Now?
  10. One: Reembodying Circulation
    1. Where Is the Body in Circulation?
    2. From Textual Actancy to Affective Agency
    3. Affective Circulation as a Transitional Feminist Rhetorical Analytic
    4. Situating Amina Sboui
  11. Two: Amplified Rhetorics
    1. Body as Object
    2. Body as Madness
    3. Body as Protest
    4. Body as Nation
    5. Amplification as a Kind of World-Making
  12. Three: Velocitized Rhetorics
    1. Sboui Versus femen and the Affective Rhetorics of Oppression and Liberation
    2. Femen Versus MWAF and the Affective Rhetorics of Universalism and Difference
    3. Irreconcilable Feminisms and the Foreclosure of Possibility
    4. The West Versus the Arab World and the Affective Rhetorics of War and Terror
    5. Velocity and Polarization
  13. Four: Enduring Rhetorics
    1. Sedimented Rhetorics
    2. Universal Rhetorics
    3. Global Rhetorics
    4. Archived Rhetorics
  14. Five: Affective Circulation
    1. Affect and Rhetorical Responsibility, Agency, and Efficacy
    2. Affective Futures
  15. Acknowledgments
  16. Notes
  17. Bibliography
  18. Index

Index

Page numbers in italic refer to illustrations.

  • Abu-Lughod, Lila, 29
  • actancy, textual, 25–32
  • activism: Arab uprisings, 36–37; body as protest, 52–59; and circulation of affect, 137–38; counterprotest, 79; effectiveness of, 70; and social justice, 34; “topless” protests, 52–54, 53, 54. See also femen
  • activity theory, 18
  • actor-network theory, 18
  • Adel, Alami, 50–51
  • affect: and agency, 130–31; definitions and frameworks, 6–7, 26–27, 71; embedded in ecology, 27, 32; and rhetorical responsibility, 128–37; rhetorics of war and terror, 89–93; and social change, 31–32; on social media platforms, 9
  • affective agency, 25–32
  • affective circulation, 11–12, 35, 125–39; Amina Sboui case study, 35–36; and feminism, shifting perspectives, 88; and feminist rhetoric, 33–36; and social change, 126–27
  • “affective currency,” 129
  • affective economies, 28
  • affective exchanges, 30–31
  • affective futures, 137–39
  • affective labor, 27
  • affective pathways, 93–94. See also circulation
  • Afghanistan, 113–14; as site of violence, 133
  • agency, 129–30; and affect, 25–32, 130–31; in liminal spaces, 130
  • Ahmed, Sara, 6, 28, 29–30, 94, 112, 128–29
  • Al Arbiya News, 50
  • Al Bawaba: Your Gateway to the Middle East (news site), 48
  • algorithms, 18
  • Amina Sboui case study, 38; affective circulation, framework of, 35–36; affective rhetorics of oppression and liberation, 73–77; amplification process, 45–46; amplification process as “world-making,” 65–67; background and context, 35, 36–42; body as protest, 52–59; channeling of meaning and endurance, 97–99; early weeks of protest, analysis of, 12–13; femen’s response to, 72–73; hysteria, accusations of, 49–52; media coverage, 47, 87–88, 128; nation, embodiment of, 59–65; objectification of body, 47–49, 100–101; oppression and liberation, rhetorics of, 73–77; reactions to, and irreconcilable feminism, 84–88; reflexivity, 132; Sboui’s motivation and impact, 41–42; Sboui’s text as risk to women, 64; social media posts as protest, 37, 40; support and solidarity, 55, 55–56; universalism and difference, rhetorics of, 77–84
  • amplification process, 11, 12, 43–67; body as protest, 52–59; challenges and conflicts, 48; concept of, 43–47; contact and interpretation, 45; “knowing” and “believing,” 56–57; madness and hysteria, 49–52; nation, embodiment of, 59–65; objectification of body, 47–49; as “world-making,” 65–67
  • anger: righteous, 79, 84, 87; toward white privilege, 85
  • Arab Spring, 64, 90
  • Arab Studies Institute, 39
  • archived rhetorics, 112–23
  • Atlantic (periodical), 89, 91
  • author’s methodology, 2–3; affect and affective engagement, concept of, 6–9, 10; Amina Sboui case, 3–4; chapter outlines, 9–14, 125–26; intersectionality, 5–6; temporality of concepts, 14–16
  • “awayness,” 70, 83, 92, 111, 128
  • Bacchetta, Paola, 15
  • Badass Muslimahs (blog), 84–85
  • Bates, Laura, 51, 58, 63
  • “battle,” rhetoric of, 89–93. See also violence
  • BBC (broadcasting company), 111
  • Bennett, Jane, 19
  • BenYoussef, Lamia, 41
  • Berlant, Lauren, 30, 94–95
  • “big data,” 18
  • Bin Laden, Osama, 90
  • Black Lives Matter movement, 15
  • Black Twitter, 22–23
  • Blair, Olivia, 101
  • bodies: and amplification process, 45–46; “as instrument,” 54–55; contagion, perceptions of, 49–52; digitality linked with, 11, 22; as embodiment of nation, 59–65; and focus of text, 12–13; globalization and neoliberalism, impact of, 2; objectification of, 47–49; as protest, 52–59; role in circulation, 18–25; tech as extension of, 20; Westernized views of, 49. See also nudity
  • Bounce Sin (online site), 62, 64–65
  • Bouteldja, Houria, 82
  • Bradshaw, Jonathan, 4
  • A Brief History of Neoliberalism (Harvey), 7–8
  • Brown, Wendy, 61, 92
  • Bush, George W., 132–33
  • BuzzFeed News, 102
  • Chaput, Catherine, 24, 26, 28, 29, 30, 34, 92–93, 131, 138; Market Affect and the Rhetoric of Political Economic Debates, 32
  • circulation: affective, 11–12, 93–95; affective, and feminist rhetoric, 33–36; affective, in digital contexts, 127; bodies, role of, 18–25; definitions and concepts, 17–18; ecological model, 18; embodied nature of, 114; reembodiment of, 10–11, 14, 17–42, 129–30; reflexive, 46; textual actancy to affective agency, 25–32
  • Circulation, Writing, and Rhetoric (Rickett), 19
  • circulation studies, 2
  • Coleman, Rebecca, 7
  • colonialism: First World vs. Third World ideologies, 59; legacies of, 15, 41, 121; and racism, 135
  • computer-mediated networks, 18
  • contagion, perceptions of, 49–51
  • Cooper, Marilyn, 129–30
  • Cosslett, Rhiannon Lucy, 55–56
  • counterprotest, 79. See also activism
  • The Cultural Politics of Emotion (Ahmed), 6
  • Daily Beast (news website), 48, 60, 61, 102, 104, 106, 108
  • Daily Mail (UK news site), 50, 102, 110
  • The Daily News (news site), 51
  • Darman, Eshmael, 104
  • Daryaei, Ahoo, 114–22, 116, 120, 121, 122
  • Dean, Jodi, 23, 31
  • DeVoss, Danielle Nicole, 43, 44, 70–71
  • Dickinson, Greg, 24
  • difference: contrasted with universalism, 103–4; rhetorics of, 77–84
  • Di Giovanni, Janine, 61–62
  • digital circulation. See circulation
  • “digital democracy,” myth of, 15
  • digital media: and amplification of affect, 137–38; as “extension” of body, 20; and transnational interaction, 1–2. See also social media platforms
  • digital rhetorical studies, 2, 5
  • Dingo, Rebecca, 33
  • dress codes, Islamic, 114, 117–19
  • Ebadi, Shirin, 120
  • ecology: affect embedded in, 27, 32; ecological model of circulation studies, 18
  • Edbauer-Rice, Jenny, 18, 27
  • Edwards, Dustin, 19, 20
  • Eileraas, Karina, 40, 41
  • Elahi-Siddiqui, Areej, 81–82
  • Elite Daily (online platform), 50, 51
  • Elmahdy, Ailaa Magda, 40
  • emotion: anger, 79, 84, 85, 87; emotional responses, 86, 101; and Facebook, 127; hysteria, 49–52; in social media, 8
  • endurance, 12, 13–14, 97–123; archived rhetorics, 112–23; global rhetorics, 107–112; overview, 97–99; sedimented rhetorics, 99–103; universal rhetorics, 103–7
  • engagement: affective, 8–9, 135; human-digital, 11; transnational, 66
  • Ennahda Party, 39, 60
  • “epidemic,” perception of, 52
  • Ettounsiya TV (Tunisian television station), 49
  • Facebook, 25–26, 127. See also social media platforms
  • Faith Freedom (blog), 51
  • Farrell, Jeremy, 39–40
  • fear, role in Islam, 108
  • fear-mongering, 88, 91
  • femen (Ukrainian activist group), 1, 13, 37; activism in Germany, 113; and Ahoo Daryaei campaigns, 121–22; Amina Sboui, response to, 72–77; Amina Sboui, use of her texts, 52–53; calls for new Arab Spring, 90; conference disturbance, 101–3, 109; continuing media coverage of, 128; endurance of protest, 100; goals of, 47; media coverage, 90–91; as metonym, 114; Muslim Women Against femen (MWAF) as reaction to, 78–84, 80; nudity, emphasis on, 119–21; texts and amplification process, 47–48; and universal rights, 104; and warfare and terror in Arab world, 89–93
  • feminism, 28–29; American feminists, opposition to, 75; assumptions concerning, 73–77; definitions and concepts, 3; and distance from Sboui’s protest, 48–49; feminist critique in Tunisia, 41; global feminism, ideal of, 3, 112; and global solidarity, 67; irreconcilable feminisms, 84–88; and protest in MENA region, 40; rhetoric and affective circulation, 33–36; transnational feminist rhetoric, 10; Tunisia and amplification as feminist nation, 61–62; universal practices, 87; Western ideologies, 55, 62, 75, 84–85; white Western feminism, critiques of, 83–84
  • flags, Islamic, 89–90
  • Forget the Box (online magazine), 58
  • Foucault, Michel, 15
  • France 24 (news outlet), 60
  • free market mindsets, 21–22, 92
  • gender roles. See women’s roles
  • Giovanni, Janine, 48–49, 62, 70, 75
  • global feminism, 3. See also feminism
  • globalization: global rhetorics, 107–12; and women’s bodies, 2. See also transnationalist contexts
  • “governance at a distance” (Foucault), 15
  • Greenhouse, Emily, 90
  • Gregg, Melissa, 30
  • Grewal, Inderpal, 36, 66–67, 137
  • Gries, Laurie, 19, 20, 21, 27, 45, 130
  • The Guardian (newspaper), 54, 89
  • Gurney, Matt, 47
  • Hajri, Salma, 40
  • Hardy, Alisa, 22, 137–38
  • Harvey, David, 7–8, 144n16
  • hashtags, 19–20; agency of, 22
  • Hasso, Frances, 37
  • Hennessy, Rosemary, 31
  • Hesford, Wendy, 33, 60
  • hijab requirements, 114, 119. See also Daryaei, Ahoo
  • Hillis, Ken, 27
  • Huffington Post (news website), 52–53, 64, 89
  • Huffington Post UK (news website), 58, 87
  • Human Rights Watch, 90, 111
  • hysteria, 49–52. See also emotion
  • Independent (UK-based news site), 101, 102, 107
  • Instagram, 9. See also social media platforms
  • interarticulation, 36
  • International Business Times, 87
  • Internet as public sphere, 23–24
  • intersectionality: of disciplines, 5, 16; power and identity, 5–6; race and gender, 88, 109–10, 122
  • invention, process of, 131
  • Iran: Ahoo Daryaei case, 114–22, 116, 120, 121, 122
  • Iran International (news network), 117, 118
  • Iran Wire (online news outlet), 116–17
  • Iraq, alternative media in, 43–44
  • Islam: assumptions concerning, 73–77; dress codes, 114, 117–19; fear, role of, 108; gender roles and oppression, 110–11; Islamic flags, burning of, 89–90; Mecca Fire, 111–12; metonymic chains, 105–6; “Muslim feminists” contrasted with “Western feminists,” 78–79, 84–85; and violent oppression, 106–7; Western world contrasted with Arab world, 89–93. See also veiled Muslim women
  • Jadaliyya (ezine), 39
  • Jagger, Alison, 67
  • James, Olivia, 62, 64–65
  • Jezebel (website), 132–33
  • Jordan: Al Bawaba news site, 48
  • Kafir Crusaders (blog), 47, 73–74, 76
  • Kaplan, Caren, 137
  • Kelly, Maeve, 134–36
  • Kimmage, Daniel, 43–44
  • Klein, Jessica, 58
  • Kozol, Wendy, 60
  • Kraidy, Marwan, 37
  • Lang, Heather, 19, 20
  • language: militant, 108–9; violent, 15–16
  • LeCourt, Donna, 31, 129
  • liberation, 58; affective rhetorics of, 73–77; nudity, emphasis on, 119–21
  • liminal spaces and agency, 130
  • The Local Fr (news network), 102, 106, 109
  • Lunceford, Brett, 20
  • Macnab, Geoffrey, 107
  • “madness,” 49–52
  • magnification, ideological, 12, 45–46
  • Mahjoub, Amir, 117
  • male gaze, 48
  • “market affect,” 32
  • Market Affect and the Rhetoric of Political Economic Debates (Chaput), 32
  • Maryam Namazie: Nothing is Sacred (blog), 60
  • materiality: material aspects of affect, 6–7, 30; materialist perspectives, 9–10; material “situatedness,” 71–72; new materialism, 16, 19–20, 24–25, 27, 130
  • McPartland, Ben, 109
  • Mecca Fire, 111–12
  • media coverage, mainstream, 87–88, 90–91, 128
  • metonymies, 98–99, 103–4; femen as, 105, 108–9, 112
  • MeToo movement, 15
  • MFS-The Other News (blog), 50, 51
  • Middle East Online (news outlet), 90
  • Mikdashi, Maya, 30
  • militant language, 108–9
  • misogyny, 60, 77, 87, 104, 108
  • Mohanty, Chandra, 59
  • Monbiot, George, 22
  • Movahed, Vida, 121
  • Musk, Elon, 22
  • Muslimah Pride Day, 78–79, 81, 86
  • Muslim Women Against femen (MWAF), 13, 78–84, 80; critiques of, 85–86, 92; and irreconcilable feminisms, 84–88; MWAF critique of femen, 94; “Open-Letter to femen,” 79
  • Namazie, Maryam, 57, 60, 86–87
  • nation, body as embodiment of, 59–65
  • National Post (newspaper), 89
  • necropolitics, 10
  • Nelson, Sara, 58, 64
  • neoliberalism, 7–8, 21–22, 92, 144n16; affective economies, 27–28; conceptual frameworks, 25; and Internet, 127; universality and solidarity, 114; and women’s bodies, 2
  • Networked Affect (Hillis et al.), 27
  • Networking Arguments (Dingo), 33
  • “new materialist” turn, 16, 19–20, 24–25, 27, 130
  • New Statesman (periodical), 55
  • Newsweek (periodical), 111
  • New Yorker (periodical), 89, 90
  • Nguyen, Kim Hong, 25, 26
  • Nomani, Asra, 104, 105–6
  • Nothing is Sacred (blog), 57
  • nudity: and liberation, 119–21; media reaction to, 47; and objectification of body, 47; perceptions of, 86, 117. See also bodies
  • NY Daily News (newspaper), 89
  • Obama, Barack, 21
  • object-oriented frameworks, 2, 11, 16, 18–19, 20, 126
  • objectification of bodies, 47–49
  • oppression: affective rhetorics of, 73–77; gender oppression, 114, 116, 119, 127, 133; and militant language, 108–9; veil as symbol of, 29; and violence, 107; Western ideologies, 103
  • “othering” of bodies, 109, 128
  • Ott, Brian L., 24
  • Paasonen, Susanna, 27
  • Patheos (website), 132
  • Petit, Michael, 27
  • Pfister, Damien Smith, 22
  • Plumb, Alexander, 100–101, 102, 110
  • polarization, 69–70; magnetic, scientific model of, 71; and velocity, 93–95; Western feminism vs. Islam, 78–79, 99
  • power relations, 14–15, 16; asymmetrical dynamics, 11, 139; challenges to power structures, 8–9; and circulation, 4–5, 24–25, 139; empowerment vs. disempowerment, 61; and neoliberalism, 7–8; “thing-power,” 2, 19, 27; in transnational contexts, 34; and visibility, 22–23
  • protest. See activism
  • public decency laws, 114. See also Daryaei, Ahoo
  • Pussy Riot, 40, 52, 58
  • Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, 43–44
  • “recomposition,” 44, 70–71
  • “Redefining Rhetoric” (Ott & Dickinson), 24
  • reflexivity, 131–32, 136–37; and circulation, 46
  • relationality, 11, 27, 128–29, 131–32
  • rhetorical studies: and digital circulation, 5; “new materialist” turn, 16, 19–20, 24–25, 27, 130; rhetoric and social change, 131–37
  • Riaz, Hana, 82–83
  • Richard Dawkins Foundation for Reason and Science, 63
  • Rickett, Thomas, 19
  • Ridolfo, Jim, 43, 44, 70–71
  • Ridolfo, Kathleen, 43–44
  • Ronaghi, Hossein, 120
  • Roosh V (website), 75–77
  • Salime, Zakia, 37
  • Salzano, Matthew, 22
  • Saudi Arabia: Mecca Fire, 111–12; oppression within, 111
  • Sboui, Amina, 1, 35; and author’s methodology, 3–4. See also Amina Sboui case study
  • Schemm, Paul, 89
  • sedimentation, 98, 112; sedimented rhetorics, 99–103. See also endurance
  • Seigworth, Gregory, 30
  • Shevchenko, Inna, 54, 56–57, 87–88, 91, 107. See also femen (Ukrainian activist group)
  • Shout Out UK (news source), 100
  • “situatedness,” 71–72
  • SlutWalk, 40, 52
  • social media platforms: and critical engagement, 9; and emotion, 8; Facebook, 25–26, 237; Muslim Women Against femen (MWAF) use of, 78–79; public vs. private life entanglements, 25–26; X (formerly Twitter), 9, 22–23
  • solidarity, 28–29; among women, 81–82; coalition-building contrasted with “us-them” relationships, 85–87; contrasted with women’s multiple identities, 82–84; global, 67; with historic activism, 57; and support for Amina Sboui, 55–56; as white privilege, 82
  • Spectacular Rhetorics (Hesford), 33
  • Spivak, Gayatri, 59, 66
  • Still Life with Rhetoric (Gries), 19, 21
  • surveillance, 15
  • Swann, Greg, 74–75
  • Taliban, 88, 113, 114
  • Tashabilities (tumblr), 85
  • Tayler, Jeffrey, 91–92
  • temporality: and author’s methodology, 14–16; and ephemerality in digital spaces, 4
  • terrorism, 114, 133; “War on Terror,” 1–2, 108
  • textual actancy, 25–32
  • “thing activity,” 21
  • “thing-matter,” 19
  • “thing-power,” 2, 19–20, 27
  • “thing-symbol,” 24
  • TikTok, 9; movements to ban, 15. See also social media platforms
  • time. See temporality
  • Time Magazine, 114
  • “Titslamism,” 47, 76, 90
  • “topless” protests, 52–54, 53, 54
  • “towardness,” 70, 83, 92, 128
  • transcoding, 36
  • “Transnational Feminist Practices Against War” (Bacchetta), 15
  • transnationalist contexts: facilitated by digital media, 1–2; feminist rhetoric, 10, 33–36
  • transsituationality, 28, 32, 114
  • Trump, Donald, 92–93; rhetoric of, 15–16
  • Tunisia: Amina Sboui case, 1; Amina Sboui case, reaction to, 37; amplification as feminist nation, 61–63; constitution and women’s rights, 37–40, 146n67; embodiment of nation, 59–60; feminist critique within, 41; women’s rights, 49, 90
  • Tunisian Association of Democratic Women, 40
  • Twitter (rebranded X), 9, 22–23. See also social media platforms
  • Ukrainian feminists, 74–75. See also femen (Ukrainian activist group)
  • UN Commission of the Status of Women, 115
  • universalism, rhetorics of, 77–84, 92, 103–7
  • universal rights, calls for, 91
  • UN News (news outlet), 118
  • “us-them” frameworks, 77, 90–91
  • veiled Muslim women, 28–29; nudity as antithesis of veil, 86; veil as symbol of agency, 106; veil as symbol of oppression, 29, 71, 98
  • velocity, 11, 13, 69–95, 132; affective rhetorics of oppression and liberation, 73–77; affective rhetorics of universalism and difference, 77–84; affective rhetorics of war and terror, 89–93; and effectiveness of activism, 70; and irreconcilable feminisms, 84–88; overview, 69–73; and polarization, 93–95
  • Vibrant Matter (Bennett), 19
  • violence: associated with beliefs about Islam, 98–99; and fear, 107–8; language of, 15–16; and militant language, 108–9; and oppression of women, 109–10; terrorism, 114, 133
  • visibility in digital spaces, 22, 127, 132
  • warfare, rhetoric of, 89–93
  • Warner, Michael, 46, 51, 56
  • “War on Terror,” 1–2, 108
  • Warren, Elizabeth, 92–93
  • Washington Post (newspaper), 89
  • wealth. See neoliberalism
  • Western ideologies, 62, 136; feminism, 29, 53, 55, 57, 59, 67, 78, 81–85, 100; of liberation and bodies, 47, 49, 103, 118
  • white privilege, 85
  • white saviour concepts, 134–35
  • WorldNetDaily (news outlet), 102, 106
  • women’s roles: global gender hierarchies, 81; multiple identities of women, 82–84; Muslim women, 28–29; oppressed vs. oppressors, 110–11; and protest in MENA, 37; women, oppression of, 109–11; women’s psychology and “hysteria,” 50–51; women’s rights in Tunisia, 90
  • Women Under Siege (blog), 51, 58, 63
  • “worlding,” 66
  • “world-making,” 46, 56, 65–67
  • X (formerly Twitter), 9, 22–23. See also social media platforms
  • #YesAllWomen’s thing-power, 19–20
  • Yousafzai, Malala, 58

Annotate

Previous
© 2026 University of South Carolina
Powered by Manifold Scholarship. Learn more at
Opens in new tab or windowmanifoldapp.org