Skip to main content

Influential Machines: The Rhetoric of Computational Performance: Works Cited

Influential Machines: The Rhetoric of Computational Performance
Works Cited

  • Show the following:

    Annotations
    Resources

  • Adjust appearance:

    Font
    Font style
    Color Scheme
    Light
    Dark
    Annotation contrast
    Low
    High
    Margins
  • Search within:
    • Notifications
    • Privacy
  • Project HomeInfluential Machines
  • Projects
  • Learn more about Manifold

Notes

table of contents
  1. Cover Page
  2. Title Page
  3. Copyright
  4. Dedication
  5. Contents
  6. List of Tables and Figures
  7. Acknowledgments
  8. Introduction: Locating the Energies of Computational Performance
    1. The Rhetorical Energies of Computing Machines
    2. Beyond the Front and the Back Ends of Computing and Toward the Deep End
    3. Thickening Procedurality with the Rhetorical Energies of Computational Performance
  9. Chapter 1: Manufactured Processing, Ritual, and Expert Systems
    1. Automation as Ritual of Science
    2. Knowledge-Based Systems and Looking to Machines for Answers about Health
    3. The Manufactured Processing of Vaccine Calculator
    4. The Energetic Movements of “Experts” and Science Communication
  10. Chapter 2: Processual Magnitude, the Sublime, and Computational Poiesis
    1. The Aesthetics of Vast Computing
    2. The Sublime Energies of @censusAmericans
    3. Attuning to the Angst of @censusAmericans
    4. Doing More with Computational Performance
  11. Chapter 3: Processual Signaling, Compulsion, and Neural Networks
    1. Persuasion, Indication, and Affective Compulsion
    2. The “Grooves” of Neural Networks
    3. The Machinic Parody of @DeepDrumpf
    4. The Critique of Processual Signaling
  12. Chapter 4: Designing Computational Performances to Actively Contribute Positive Energies
    1. Moral Luck and the Machine Question
    2. First- and Second-Order Agency
    3. Hedging Against Moral (Un)Luckiness and the Limits of Avoidance
    4. Computational Performance and an Ethic of (Distributed) Responsibility
    5. Pushing on the Precautionary Principle and the Paradox of Machinic Intervention
    6. Doing Good Instead of Avoiding Wrong with Alexa
    7. Good Machines, Speaking Well
  13. Chapter 5: Leveraging the Rhetorical Energies of Machines
    1. The Informational and Persuasive Labors of Machine Communicators During the Pandemic
    2. Going “Deeper” Toward Anthropomechanation
    3. Enlivening Human–Machine Communication with Rhetorical Energies
    4. Enlivening Inoculations Against Misinformation with Machinic Rhetorical Energies
  14. Notes
  15. Works Cited
  16. Index

Page 139 →Works Cited

  • Abbate, Janet. Recoding Gender: Women’s Changing Participation in Computing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2012.
  • Adam, Alison. “Constructions of Gender in the History of Artificial Intelligence.” IEEE Annals of the History of Computing 18, no. 3 (1996): 47–53.
  • Adams, Douglas. The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy. New York: Del Rey, 2009.
  • Addady, Michel. “John Oliver’s ‘Make Donald Drumpf Again’ Is Really Taking Off.” Fortune, March 9, 2016. http://fortune.com.
  • Akerkar, Rajendra A., and Priti Srinivas Sajja. Knowledge-Based Systems. Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett, 2010.
  • Alagha, Emily Couvillon, and Rachel Renee Helbing. “Evaluating the Quality of Voice Assistants’ Responses to Consumer Health Questions about Vaccines: An Exploratory Comparison of Alexa, Google Assistant and Siri.” BMJ Health & Care Informatics 26 (2019): 1–6.
  • Alter, Adam L., Daniel M. Oppenheimer, and Nicholas Epley. “Overcoming Intuition: Metacognitive Difficulty Activates Analytic Reasoning.” Journal of Experimental Psychology General 136, no. 4 (2007): 569–76.
  • Amazon. “Amazon Alexa.” 2018. https://developer.amazon.com/alexa.
  • Ames, Morgan G. “Deconstructing the Algorithmic Sublime.” Big Data & Society, January 2018: 1–4.
  • Amoore, Louise. Cloud Ethics: Algorithms and the Attributes of Ourselves and Others. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2020.
  • Amundson, Timm. “Why I Support Donald Trump.” The Federalist, March 26, 2016, http://thefederalist.com.
  • Anderson, Wayne. “‘Perpetual Affirmations, Unexplained’: The Rhetoric of Reiteration in Coleridge, Carlyle, and Emerson.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 71, no. 1 (1985): 37–51.
  • Aquilina, Mario. “The Computational Sublime in Nick Montfort’s ‘Round’ and ‘All the Names of God’.” CounterText 1, no. 3 (2015): 348–65.
  • Banas, John A., and Stephen A. Rains. “A Meta-Analysis of Research on Inoculation Theory.” Communication Monographs 77, no. 3 (2010): 281–311.
  • Page 140 →Banks, Jaime, and Maartje de Graaf. “Toward an Agent-Agnostic Transmission Model: Synthesizing Anthropocentric and Technocentric Paradigms in Communication.” Human-Machine Communication 1, no. 1 (2020): 19–36.
  • Barad, Karen. Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2007.
  • _____. “Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 28, no. 3 (2003): 801–31.
  • Barnett, Scot, and Casey Boyle. “Rhetorical Ontology, or, How to Do Things with Things.” In Rhetoric, Through Everyday Things, edited by Scot Barnett and Casey Boyle, 1–14. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press, 2016.
  • Barton, Cass. “Twitter Bots Are Making Data Human Again,” Medium, accessed October 7, 2021. https://medium.com.
  • Basol, Melisa, Jon Roozenbeek, and Sander van der Linden. “Good News About Bad News: Gamified Inoculation Boosts Confidence and Cognitive Immunity Against Fake News.” Journal of Cognition 3, no. 1 (2020): 1–9.
  • Batson, C. Daniel, Jakob Håkansson Eklund, Valerie L. Chermok, Jennifer L. Hoyt, and Biaggio G. Ortiz. “An Additional Antecedent of Empathic Concern: Valuing the Welfare of the Person in Need.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 93, no. 1 (2007): 65–74.
  • Battineni, Gopi, Nalini Chintalapudi, and Francesco Amenta. “AI Chatbot Design During an Epidemic Like the Novel Coronavirus.” Healthcare 8, no. 2 (2020): 1–8.
  • Bedini, Silvio. “The Role of Automata in the History of Technology.” Technology and Culture 5, no. 1 (1964): 24–42.
  • Bellinger, Matthew. “The Rhetoric of Error in Digital Media.” Computational Culture: A Journal of Software Studies, no. 5 (2016): 1–25.
  • Besel, Richard D. “Opening the ‘Black Box’ of Climate Change Science: Actor-Network Theory and Rhetorical Practice in Scientific Controversies.” Southern Communication Journal 76, no. 2 (2011): 120–36.
  • Bethea, Charles. “The Joy of Paul (Bear) Vasquez, the Double Rainbow Guy.” New Yorker, May 13, 2020. www.newyorker.com.
  • Bitzer, Lloyd. “The Rhetorical Situation.” Philosophy & Rhetoric 25, no. 1 (1992): 1–14.
  • Boeher, Bruce and Trish T. Henley. “Automated Marlowe: Hero and Leander 31–36.” Exemplaria 20, no. 1 (2013): 98–119.
  • _____. Persuasive Games: The Expressive Power of Videogames. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2007.
  • _____. “Sorry, Alexa Is Not a Feminist.” The Atlantic, January 24, 2018. www.theatlantic.com.
  • Bollinger, Lee C. The Tolerant Society. New York: Oxford University Press, 1986.
  • Bosmajian, Haig A. Burning Books. Jefferson, NC: McFarland, 2006. Bowden,
  • Bertram V., editor. “A Brief History of Computation.” In Faster than Thought: A Symposium on Digital Computing Machines, 3–31. London: Pittman & Sons, 1953.
  • Page 141 →Boyle, Casey Andrew. Rhetoric as a Posthuman Practice. Columbus: The Ohio State University Press, 2018.
  • Boyle, Casey, James J. Brown Jr, and Steph Ceraso. “The Digital: Rhetoric Behind and Beyond the Screen.” Rhetoric Society Quarterly 48, no. 3 (2018): 251–59.
  • Bradshaw, Jonathan L. “Rhetorical Exhaustion and the Ethics of Amplification.” Computers and Composition 56 (2020): 102568.
  • Brink, David O. “Millian Principles, Freedom of Expression, and Hate Speech.” Legal Theory 7, no. 2 (2001): 119–57.
  • Brock, Kevin. “One Hundred Thousand Billion Processes: Oulipian Computation and the Composition of Digital Cybertexts.” Technoculture 2 (2012): np. http://dx.doi.org/10.17613/M6BV98.
  • ———. Rhetorical Code Studies: Discovering Arguments in and Around Code. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2019.
  • Brock, Kevin, and Dawn Shepherd. “Understanding How Algorithms Work Persuasively through the Procedural Enthymeme.” Computers and Composition 42 (2016): 17–27.
  • Brown, James J., Jr. “Rhetorical Devices.” In Rhetorical Machines: Writing, Code, and Computational Ethics, edited by John Jones and Lavinia Hirsu, 227–36. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press, 2019.
  • Brown, James J., Jr., and Gregory Hennis. “Hateware and the Outsourcing of Responsibility.” In Digital Ethics: Rhetoric and Responsibility in Online Aggression, edited by Jessica Reyman and Erika M. Sparby, 17–32. New York: Routledge, 2019.
  • Brown, James J., Jr., and Nathaniel A. Rivers. “Encomium of QWERTY.” In Rhetoric, Through Everyday Things, edited by Scot Barnett and Casey Boyle, 212–25. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press, 2016.
  • _____. Ethical Programs: Hospitality and Rhetorics of Software. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2015.
  • Brunner, Elizabeth. “Wild Public Networks and Affective Movements in China: Environmental Activism, Social Media, and Protest in Maoming.” Journal of Communication 67, no. 5 (2017): 665–77.
  • Burke, Kenneth. Counter-Statement. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1968.
  • Burns, Janet. “‘DeepDrumpf’ Is an Uncanny Twitterbot That’s Fundraising for Girls in STEM.” Forbes, October 19, 2016. www.forbes.com.
  • Burrell, Jenna. “How the Machine ‘Thinks’: Understanding Opacity in Machine-learning Algorithms.” Big Data & Society 3, no. 1 (2016): 1–12.
  • Burke, Kenneth. Language as Symbolic Action: Essays on Life, Literature, and Method. Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1966.
  • _____. On Symbols and Society, edited by Joseph R. Gusfield. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1989.
  • Burnedyourtweet. “Giving Trump’s messages the attention they deserve.” Twitter. https://twitter.com/burnedyourtweet?lang=en.
  • Page 142 →Burroughs, William S. “On Coincidence.” In The Adding Machine: Selected Essays, 97–103. New York: Arcade, 1993.
  • Bush, Vannevar. “As We May Think.” The Atlantic, July 1945. https://www.theatlantic.com.
  • Carey, James W., and John J. Quirk. “The Mythos of the Electronic Revolution.” The American Scholar (1970): 395–424.
  • Carey, Tamika L. “Necessary Adjustments: Black Women’s Rhetorical Impatience.” Rhetoric Review 39, no. 3 (2020): 269–86.
  • Carmichael, Joe. “How the A.I. Behind Twitter’s Odd @DeepDrumpf is Making Donald Trump Great Again.” Inverse, March 4, 2016. www.inverse.com
  • Catch-Up Vaccination Scheduler. “Start,” “History,” “About,” and “Schedule” pages. [Webpage Archive from March 2020]. https://web.archive.org/web/20200319052205 /https://www.vacscheduler.org/.
  • Ceccarelli, Leah. “The Ends of Rhetoric: Aesthetic, Political, Epistemic.” In Making and Unmaking the Prospects for Rhetoric: Selected Papers from the 1996 Rhetoric Society of America Conference, edited by Theresa Jarnagin Enos, Richard McNabb, Roxanne Mountford, and Carolyn Miller, 65–74. New York: Routledge, 1997.
  • _____. “The Ends of Rhetoric Revisited: Three Readings of the Gettysburg Address.” In The Viability of the Rhetorical Tradition, edited by Richard Graff, Arthur E. Walzer, and Janet M. Atwill, 47–60. Albany: SUNY Press, 2005.
  • _____. “Manufactured Scientific Controversy: Science, Rhetoric, and Public Debate.” Rhetoric & Public Affairs 14, no. 2 (2011): 195–228.
  • censusAmericans. Twitter Account, accessed August 31, 2018. https://twitter.com/censusamericans?lang=en.
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. “Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices Recommended Immunization Schedule for Children and Adolescents Aged 18 Years or Younger–United States, 2018,” February 9, 2018. https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/67/wr/mm6705e2.htm.
  • _____. “Instant Childhood Immunization Schedule,” February 6, 2018. https://www2a.cdc.gov/nip/kidstuff/newscheduler_le/.
  • Ceruzzi, Paul E. A History of Modern Computing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2003.
  • Chaput, Catherine. Market Affect and the Rhetoric of Political Economic Debates. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press, 2019.
  • _____. “Rhetorical Circulation in Late Capitalism: Neoliberalism and the Overdetermination of Affective Energy.” Philosophy and Rhetoric 43, no. 1 (2010): 1–25.
  • Chaput, Catherine, and Crystal Broch Colombini. “The Mathematization of the Invisible Hand: Rhetorical Energy and the Crafting of Economic Spontaneity.” In Arguing with Numbers: The Intersections of Rhetoric and Mathematics, edited by James Wynn and G. Mitchell Reyes, 55–81. University Park: Pennsylvania University Press, 2021.
  • “Child and Adolescent Vaccine Assessment Tool.” Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, April 1, 2022. https://www2a.cdc.gov/vaccines/childquiz/.
  • Page 143 →Christ of the Abyss Statue. http://www.christoftheabyss.net/
  • [Cicero]. Rhetorica ad Herennium, translated by H. Caplan. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1964.
  • Clark, Kevin. “Premiere of Census Americans, Setting a Twitter Bot to Music.” Kevin-ClarkComposer. http://kevinclarkcomposer.com
  • Coleman, E. Gabriella. Coding Freedom: The Ethics and Aesthetics of Hacking. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2013, 93.
  • _____. “The Craft and Craftiness of Hacking.” In Coding Freedom: The Ethics and Aesthetics of Hacking. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2013.
  • Coleman, Miles C. “Attempting to Stop the Spread: Epistemic Responsibility and Platformed Responses to the COVID-19 ‘Infodemic’.” In Social Media Ethics and COVID-19: Well-Being, Truth, Misinformation, and Authenticity, edited by Berrin Beasley and Pamela Zeiser, 9–30. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2022.
  • _____. “Bots, Social Capital, and the Need for Civility.” Journal of Media Ethics 33, no. 3 (2018): 120–32.
  • _____. “Comparative Rhetorics of Technology and the Energies of Ancient Indian Robots.” In Handbook on Comparative Rhetoric, edited by Keith Lloyd, 365–73. New York: Routledge, 2020.
  • _____. “Machinic Rhetorics and the Influential Movements of Robots.” Review of Communication 18, no. 4 (2018): 336–51.
  • Coleman, Miles C., Brandon Simon, Matt Pierce, and Charles Schutte. “Emergent Sonification: Using Computational Media to Communicate the Anthropocene in ByrdBot.” Science Communication 45, no. 2 (2023): 252–66.
  • Coleman, Miles C., and Gina Neff. “Ghosts in the Machine: Using Lively Metaphors to Understand Connections Between Technological Determinisms and New Media.” National Communication Association Conference, Chicago, IL, November 2014.
  • Coleman, Miles C., and Joy M. Cypher. “The Digital Rhetorics of AIDS Denialist Networked Publics.” First Monday 25, no. 10 (2020): 1–15.
  • Colton, Jared S., and Steve Holmes. Rhetoric, Technology, and the Virtues. Louisville: University Press of Colorado, 2018.
  • Compton, Josh. “Inoculation Theory.” In The SAGE Hand-Book of Persuasion: Developments in Theory and Practice, 2d ed., edited by James Price Dillard and Lijiang Shen, 220–36. Los Angeles: SAGE, 2013.
  • _____. “Prophylactic Versus Therapeutic Inoculation Treatments for Resistance to Influence.” Communication Theory 30, no. 3 (2020): 330–43.
  • Compton, Josh, Ben Jackson, and James A. Dimmock. “Persuading Others to Avoid Persuasion: Inoculation Theory and Resistant Health Attitudes.” Frontiers in Psychology 7 (2016): 1–9.
  • Compton, Josh, and Michael Pfau. “Spreading Inoculation: Inoculation, Resistance to Influence, and Word-of-Mouth Communication.” Communication Theory 19, no. 1 (2009): 9–28.
  • Page 144 →Conner-Simons, Adam. “Postdoc’s Trump Twitterbot Uses AI to Train Itself on Transcripts from Trump Speeches.” MIT Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, March 4, 2016. http://into.ai/blog/news-stories/.
  • Cox, Gunther. “Statements.” Chatterbot. https://chatterbot.readthedocs.io/en/stable/conversations.html.
  • Crick, Nathan. “Composing the Will to Power: John Dewey on Democratic Rhetorical Education.” Rhetoric Society Quarterly 46, no. 4 (2016): 287–307.
  • Cristo degli Abissi [Christ of the Abyss]. Atlas Obscura. www.atlasobscura.com.
  • Davis, Philip J. and Reuben Hersh. “Rhetoric and Mathematics.” In The Rhetoric of the Human Sciences: Language and Argument in Scholarship and Public Affairs, edited by John S. Nelson, Allan Megill, and Deirdre N. McCloskey, 53–68. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1987.
  • DeepDrumpf. Twitter Account, accessed August 31, 2018. https://twitter.com/.
  • Del Vicario, Michela, Alessandro Bessi, Fabiana Zollo, Fabio Petroni, Antonio Scala, Guido Caldarelli, H. Eugene Stanley, and Walter Quattrociocchi. “The Spreading of Misinformation Online.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113, no. 3 (2016): 554–59.
  • Deng, Boer. “The Robot’s Dilemma: Working Out How to Build Ethical Robots Is One of the Thorniest Challenges in Artificial Intelligence.” Nature 523, no. 7558 (2015): 24–26.
  • Deuze, Mark. “Participation, Remediation, Bricolage: Considering Principal Components of a Digital Culture.” The Information Society 22, no. 2 (2006): 63–75.
  • Dinsmore, John. “Thunder in the Gap.” In The Symbolic and Connectionist Paradigms: Closing the Gap, edited by John Dinsmore, 1–24. New York: Psychology Press.
  • Dredge, Stuart. “Deep Drumpf: The Twitter Bot Trying to Out-Trump the Donald.” The Guardian, March 4, 2016. www.theguardian.com.
  • Drum, Kevin. “Donald Trump Is a Consistent, Brazen, Serial Liar.” Mother Jones, August 29, 2016. www.motherjones.com.
  • Edwards, Chad, Autumn Edwards, Patric R. Spence, and Ashleigh K. Shelton. “Is That a Bot Running the Social Media Feed? Testing the Differences in Perceptions of Communication Quality for a Human Agent and a Bot Agent on Twitter.” Computers in Human Behavior 33 (2014): 372–76.
  • Eldridge, Alice C. “Cyborg Dancing: Generative Systems for Man Machine Musical Improvisation.” In Proceedings of Third Iteration, 129–41. Melbourne, Australia: CEMA, 2005.
  • Engineer, Faramroze G., Pınar Keskinocak, and Larry K. Pickering. “OR Practice—Catch-Up Scheduling for Childhood Vaccination.” Operations Research 57, no. 6 (2009): 1307–19.
  • Farnell, Richard Lewis. The Cults of the Greek States, Vol. IV. London: Oxford at the Clarendon Press, 1907.
  • Farrell, Thomas B. “The Weight of Rhetoric: Studies in Cultural Delirium.” Philosophy & Rhetoric 41, no. 4 (2008): 467–87.
  • Page 145 →Felter, Claire E. “How to Use the ‘Drumpfinator’ Chrome Extension,” Bustle, March 2, 2016, accessed April 28, 2023, https://www.bustle.com/.
  • Fisher, Walter R. Human Communication as Narration: Toward a Philosophy of Reason, Value, and Action. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press, 1987.
  • _____. “Narration as a Human Communication Paradigm: The Case of Public Moral Argument.” Communications Monographs 51, no. 1 (1984): 1–22.
  • Floridi, Luciano. “Distributed Morality in an Information Society.” Science and Engineering Ethics 19, no. 3 (2013): 727–43.
  • _____. “On the Morality of Artificial Agents.” Minds and Machines 14, no. (2004): 349–79.
  • Fortunati, Leopoldina, and Autumn P. Edwards. “Moving Ahead with Human–Machine Communication.” Human-Machine Communication 2, no. 1 (2021): 7–28.
  • _____. “Opening Space for Theoretical, Methodological, and Empirical Issues in Human–Machine Communication.” Human-Machine Communication 1, no. 1 (2020): 1–18.
  • Friedman, Batya, and Helen Nissenbaum. “Bias in Computer Systems.” ACM Transactions on Information Systems 14, no. 3 (1996): 330–47.
  • Gallagher, John R. “Machine Time: Unifying Chronos and Kairos in an Era of Ubiquitous Technologies.” Rhetoric Review 39, no. 4 (2020): 522–35.
  • Georgia Institute of Technology. “Tool Creates Personalized Catch-Up Vaccine Schedules.” Infection Control Today, May 20, 2008. www.infectioncontroltoday.com.
  • Gillespie, Tarleton. Custodians of the Internet: Platforms, Content Moderation, and the Hidden Decisions that Shape Social Media. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2018.
  • GPT-3. “A Robot Wrote This Entire Article. Are You Scared Yet, Human?” The Guardian, September 8, 2020, https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/sep/08/.
  • Gross, Alan, G. “The Roles of Rhetoric in the Public Understanding of Science.” Public Understanding of Science 3, no. 1 (1994): 3–23.
  • Gross, Daniel, M. “Being-Moved: The Pathos of Heidegger’s Rhetorical Ontology.” In Heidegger and Rhetoric, edited by Daniel M. Gross and Ansgar Kemmann, 1–46. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2005.
  • Gunkel, David J. “Communication and Artificial Intelligence: Opportunities and Challenges for the 21st Century.” Communication+1 1, no. 1 (2012): 1–25.
  • _____. An Introduction to Communication and Artificial Intelligence. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press, 2020.
  • _____. The Machine Question. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2012.
  • ———. “Mind the Gap: Responsible Robotics and the Problem of Responsibility.” Ethics and Information Technology (2017): 1–14.
  • —. “The Other Question: Socialbots and the Question of Ethics.” In Socialbots and Their Friends, edited by Robert W. Gehl and Maria Bakardjieva, 230–48. New York: Taylor and Francis, 2017.
  • Guzman, Andrea L., and Seth C. Lewis. “Artificial Intelligence and Communication: A Human–Machine Communication Agenda.” New Media & Society 22 (2020): 70–86.
  • Page 146 →Hannon, Charles. “Gender and Status in Voice User Interfaces.” Interactions 23, no. 3 (2016): 34–37.
  • Hariman, Robert. “Political Parody and Public Culture.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 94, no. 3 (2008): 247–72.
  • Hartelius, E. Johanna. “The Anxious Flâneur: Digital Archiving and the Wayback Machine.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 106, no. 4 (2020): 377–98.
  • Hatfield, Elaine, John T. Cacioppo, and Richard L. Rapson. “Emotional Contagion.” Current Directions in Psychological Science 2, no. 3 (1993): 96–100.
  • Hawhee, Debra. Moving Bodies: Kenneth Burke at the Edges of Language. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press, 2009.
  • ———. Rhetoric in Tooth and Claw: Animals, Language, Sensation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2017.
  • _____. “Rhetoric’s Sensorium.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 101, no. 1 (2015): 2–17.
  • Hawk, Byron. “Sound: Resonance as Rhetorical.” Rhetoric Society Quarterly 48, no. 3 (2018): 315–23.
  • Heidegger, Martin. On Being and Time, translated by Joan Stambaugh. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2010.
  • Henriques, Julian, Milla Tiainen, and Pasi Väliaho. “Rhythm Returns: Movement and Cultural Theory.” Body & Society 20, no. 3–4 (2014): 3–29.
  • Hepp, Andreas. “Artificial Companions, Social Bots, and Works Bots: Communicative Robots as Research Objects of Media and Communication Studies.” Media, Culture, & Society 42, no. 7–8 (2020): 1410–26.
  • Herndon, Cristina. “Case Study: How Georgia State University Supports Every Student with Personalized Text Messaging.” AdmitHub, March 6, 2017. https://blog.admithub.com.
  • Herriman, Maguire, Elana Meer, Roy Rosin, Vivian Lee, Vindell Washington, and Kevin G. Volpp. “Asked and Answered: Building a Chatbot to Address Covid-19-Related Concerns.” NEJM Catalyst Innovations in Care Delivery (2020). https://catalyst.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/CAT.20.0230.
  • Hill, Benjamin M. “Revealing Errors.” In Error: Glitch, Noise, and Jam in New Media Cultures, edited by Mark Nunes, 27–41. New York: Continuum, 2011.
  • Hill, Jennifer, W. Randolph Ford, and Ingrid G. Farreras. “Real Conversations with Artificial Intelligence: A Comparison Between Human–Human Online Conversations and Human–Chatbot Conversations.” Computers in Human Behavior 49 (2015): 245–50.
  • Holmes, Steve. The Rhetoric of Video Games as Embodied Practice: Procedural Habits. New York: Routledge, 2018.
  • Horner, David Sanford. “Moral Luck and Computer Ethics: Gaugin in Cyberspace.” Ethics and Information Technology 12, no. 4 (2010): 299–312.
  • IBM. “IBM Watson Natural Language Understanding: Text Analytics.” IBM, 2018, https://www.ibm.com/demos/live/.
  • Page 147 →Ingraham, Chris. “Energy: Rhetoric’s Vitality.” Rhetoric Society Quarterly 48, no. 3 (2018): 260–68.
  • Ingram, Mathew. “Microsoft’s Chatbot Was Fun for a While, Until it Turned into a Racist.” Fortune, March 24, 2016. http://fortune.com/2016/03/24/.
  • Jasinski, James. “The Status of Theory and Method in Rhetorical Criticism.” Western Journal of Communication 65, no. 3 (2001): 249–70.
  • Jjjiia. “CensusAmericans.” GitHub [code repository], last modified June 24, 2015, accessed July 28, 2017. https://github.com/jjjiia/censusAmericans.
  • Jones, Cristina. “Meet ‘Watson,’ the AI Chatbot Answering Coronavirus Questions.” The Atlantic, accessed September 30, 2021. https://www.theatlantic.com/sponsored/salesforce-2020/IBM/3391/.
  • Jones, Hillary A. “Pinning, Gazing, and Swiping Together: Identification in Visually Driven Social Media.” In Theorizing Digital Rhetoric, edited by Aaron Hess and Amber Davisson, 209–23. New York: Routledge, 2018.
  • Jones, Steve. “How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bots.” Social Media + Society 1, no. 1 (2015).
  • _____. “People, Things, Memory and Human–Machine Communication.” International Journal of Media & Cultural Politics 10, no. 3 (2014): 245–58.
  • Kahn, Richard, and Douglas Kellner. “New Media and Internet Activism: From the ‘Battle of Seattle’ to Blogging.” New Media & Society 6, no. 1 (2004): 87–95.
  • Kane, Carolyn L. High-Tech Trash: Glitch, Noise, and Aesthetic Failure. Oakland: University of California Press, 2019. https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/22982.
  • Kang, Minsoo. Sublime Dreams of Living Machines: The Automaton in The European Imagination. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2011.
  • Kant, Immanuel. Critique of the Power of Judgement, edited by Paul Guyer, translated by Paul Guyer and Eric Matthews. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
  • Karpathy, Andrej. “The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Recurrent Neural Networks.” Andrej Karpathy blog, accessed August 20, 2017. http://karpathy.github.io/2015/05/21/rnn-effectiveness/.
  • Kata, Anna. “Anti-Vaccine Activists, Web 2.0, and the Postmodern Paradigm–An Overview of Tactics and Tropes Used Online by the Anti-Vaccination Movement.” Vaccine 30, no. 25 (2012): 3778–89.
  • Kazemi, Darius. “My Favorite Stuff of 2015.” Tiny Subversions, December 30, 2015, accessed 28, 2017. http://tinysubversions.com/notes/2015-favorites/.
  • _____. “New NPM Package for Bot-Makers: Wordfilter.” Tiny Subversions, September 12, 2013. http://tinysubversions.com.
  • _____. “Wordfilter” [code repository]. GitHub, October 16, 2016. https://github.com/dariusk/wordfilter.
  • Kennedy, George A. “A Hoot in the Dark: The Evolution of General Rhetoric.” Philosophy & Rhetoric (1992): 1–21.
  • Page 148 →Kennedy, Krista. Textual Curation: Authorship, Agency, and Technology in Wikipedia and Chambers’s Cyclopædia. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press, 2016.
  • Keohane, Joe. “What News-Writing Bots Mean for the Future of Journalism.” Wired, February 16, 2017. https://www.wired.com/2017/02/.
  • King, Preston. “The Problem of Tolerance.” Government and Opposition 6, no. 2 (1971): 172–207.
  • Knight, Will. “Why I’m Backing Deep Drumpf, and You Should too.” MIT Technology Review, October 17, 2016. technologyreview.com.
  • Kruger, Justin and David Dunning. “Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing One’s Own Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-Assessments.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 77, no. 6 (1999): 1121–34.
  • LA QuakeBot. “I am a robot that tells you about earthquakes in Los Angeles as they happen.” Twitter. https://twitter.com/earthquakesLA.
  • Larson, Stephanie R. “‘Just let this sink in’: Feminist Megethos and the Role of Lists in #MeToo.” Rhetoric Review 38, no. 4 (2019): 432–44.
  • LeCun, Yann Yoshua Benglo, and Geoffrey Hinton. “Deep Learning.” Nature 521, no. 7553 (2015): 436–44.
  • Livingstone, Sonia. “Media Literacy and the Challenge of New Information and Communication Technologies.” The Communication Review 7, no. 1 (2004): 3–14.
  • Lochhead, Judy. “The Sublime, the Ineffable, and Other Dangerous Aesthetics.” Women and Music: A Journal of Gender and Culture 12, no. 1 (2008): 63–74.
  • [Longinus]. “On the Sublime.” In Loeb Classical Library: Longinus: On the Sublime, translated by W. H. Fyfe. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999.
  • Losh, Elizabeth. “Sensing Exigence: A Rhetoric for Smart Objects.” Computational Culture 5 (2016): 1–22.
  • MacIntyre, Alasdair. After Virtue. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1981.
  • Maertens, Rakoen, Frederik Anseel, and Sander van der Linden. “Combatting Climate Change Misinformation: Evidence for Longevity of Inoculation and Consensus Messaging Effects.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 70, 101455 (2020): 1–11.
  • Maertens, Rakoen, Jon Roozenbeek, Melisa Basol, and Sander van der Linden. “Long-Term Effectiveness of Inoculation Against Misinformation: Three Longitudinal Experiments.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 27, no. 1 (2021): 1–16.
  • Massumi, Brian. “The Future Birth of the Affective Fact: The Political Ontology of Threat.” In The Affect Theory Reader, edited by Melissa Gregg and Gregory J. Seigworth, 52–70. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2010.
  • The Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research. “Skills from Mayo Clinic.” Accessed May 19, 2021, https://www.mayoclinic.org/voice/apps.
  • McCormack, Jon, and Alan Dorin. “Art, Emergence and the Computational Sublime.” In Second Iteration: Conference on Generative Systems in the Electronic Arts, 67–81. Melbourne, Australia: CEMA, 2001.
  • Page 149 →McGowan, Mary Kate. “On ‘Whites Only’ Signs and Racist Hate Speech: Verbal Acts of Racial Discrimination.” In Speech and Harm: Controversies Over Free Speech, edited by Ishani Maitra and Mary Kate McGowan, 121–47. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
  • McGuire, William J. “The Effectiveness of Supportive and Refutational Defenses in Immunizing and Restoring Beliefs Against Persuasion.” Sociometry 24, no. 2 (1961): 184–97.
  • ———. “Inducing Resistance to Persuasion: Some Contemporary Approaches.” In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, edited by Leonard Berkowitz, 191–229. New York: Academic Press, 1964.
  • Metz, Rachel. “Why Microsoft Accidentally Unleased a Neo-Nazi Sexbot.” MIT Technology Review, March 24, 2016. technologyreview.com.
  • Meyer, Joachim, Chris Miller, Peter Hancock, Ewart J. de Visser, and Michael Dorneich. “Politeness in Machine-Human and Human-Human Interaction.” Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 2016 Annual Meeting 60, no. 1 (2016): 279–83.
  • Miller, Carolyn R. “A Humanistic Rationale for Technical Writing.” College English 40, no. 6 (1979): 610–17.
  • ———. “Opportunity, Opportunism, and Progress: Kairos in the Rhetoric of Technology.” Argumentation 8, no. 1 (1994): 81–96.
  • ———. “Technology as a Form of Consciousness: A Study of Contemporary Ethos.” Central States Speech Journal 29, no. 4 (1978): 228–36.
  • _____. “What Can Automation Tell Us About Agency?” Rhetoric Society Quarterly 37, no. 2 (2007): 137–57.
  • Miner, Adam S., Liliana Laranjo, and A. Baki Kocaballi. “Chatbots in the Fight Against the COVID-19 Pandemic.” npj Digital Medicine 3, Article 65 (2020): 1–4.
  • Minsky, Marvin. “Logical Versus Analogical or Symbolic Versus Connectionist or Neat Versus Scruffy.” AI Magazine 12, no. 2 (1991): 34–51.
  • Misener, Dan. “Twitter Bot Creates ‘remarkably Trump-like’ Tweets.” CBC News. October 25, 2016. www.cbc.ca/news/science/.
  • Mitchell, William John Thomas. What Do Pictures Want? The Lives and Loves of Images. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005.
  • Mosco, Vincent. The Digital Sublime: Myth, Power, and Cyberspace. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2005.
  • Motta, Matthew, Timothy Callaghan, and Steven Sylvester. “Knowing Less but Presuming More: Dunning-Kruger Effects and the Endorsement of Anti-Vaccine Policy Attitudes.” Social Science & Medicine 211 (2018): 274–81.
  • Muckelbauer, John. “Implicit Paradigms of Rhetorics: Aristotelian, Cultural, and Heliotropic.” In Rhetoric, Through Everyday Things, edited by Scot Barnett and Casey Boyle, 30–41. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press, 2016.
  • Mumford, Lewis. Technics and Civilization. New York: Harcourt Brace, 1963.
  • Page 150 →Myers, Michael W., and Sara D. Hodges. “Making It Up and Making Do: Simulation, Imagination, and Empathic Accuracy.” In Handbook of Imagination and Mental Simulation, edited by Keith D. Markman, William M. P. Klein, and Julie A. Suhr, 281–94. New York: Taylor and Francis, 2009.
  • Nagel, Thomas. “Moral Luck.” In Ethical Theory: An Anthology, edited by Russ Shaefer-Landau, 322–29. Malden, MA: John Wiley & Sons, 2013.
  • Nass, Clifford, and Youngme Moon. “Machines and Mindlessness: Social Responses to Computers.” Journal of Social Issues 56, no. 1 (2000): 81–103.
  • National Vaccine Information Center. “Biography, Chris Downey MS.” 2018. http://www.nvic.org/about/.
  • Neapolitan, Richard E., and Xia Jiang. Contemporary Artificial Intelligence. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2013.
  • Neff, Gina, and Peter Nagy. “Talking to Bots: Symbiotic Agency and the Case of Tay.” International Journal of Communication 10 (2016): 4915–31.
  • Noble, Safiya Umoja. Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism. New York: New York University Press, 2018.
  • Nobles, Alicia L., Eric C. Leas, Theodore L. Caputi, Shu-Hong Zhu, Steffanie A. Strathdee, and John W. Ayers. “Responses to Addiction Help-Seeking from Alexa, Siri, Google Assistant, Cortana, and Bixby Intelligent Virtual Assistants.” npj Digital Medicine 3, Article 11 (2020): 1–3.
  • Norman, Don. The Design of Everyday Things. New York: Basic Books, 2013.
  • Nye, David E. American Technological Sublime. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1996.
  • Ore, Ersula. “The Lost Cause, Trump Time, and the Necessity of Impatience.” Rhetoric Society Quarterly 51, no. 3 (2021): 237–39.
  • Orsagos, Patrick. “No, Amazon’s Alexa Doesn’t Say ‘the Government’ Planned the Coronavirus Pandemic.” PolitiFact, April 16, 2020, https://www.politifact.com.
  • Panikkar, Raimundo. “The Destiny of Technological Civilization: An Ancient Buddhist Legend Romavisaya.” Alternatives 10, no. 2 (1984): 237–53.
  • Paramount Pictures. Star Trek, the next Generation. Season 7. [United States] Paramount Pictures, 2002. www.imdb.com/title/tt0092455.
  • Pariser, Eli. The Filter Bubble: How the New Personalized Web Is Changing What We Read and How We Think. London: Penguin, 2011.
  • Parrish, Allison. “Task Complete.” Decontextualize, June 6, 2014, accessed July 28, 2017. http://www.decontextualize.com/.
  • Patterson, Robert E. “Intuitive Cognition and Models of Human-Automation Interaction.” Human Factors 59, no. 1 (2017): 101–15.
  • Peirce, Charles Sanders. “What Is a Sign?” In Theorizing Communication: Reading Across Traditions, edited by Robert T. Craig and Heidi L. Muller, 177–82. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2007.
  • Perdue, Peter C. “Technological Determinism in Agrarian Societies.” In Does Technology Page 151 →Drive History? edited by Leo Marx and Merritt R. Smith, 169–200. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1994.
  • Peters, John Durham. The Marvelous Clouds. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2015.
  • Pfau, Michael, and Michael Burgoon. “Inoculation in Political Campaign Communication.” Human Communication Research 15, no. 1 (1988): 91–111.
  • Potter, Jonathan, Margaret Wetherell, and Andrew Chitty. “Quantification Rhetoric–Cancer on Television.” Discourse & Society 2, no. 3 (1991): 333–65.
  • Prior, Markus. “Media and Political Polarization,” Annual Review of Political Science 16 (2013): 101–27.
  • Quintilian. Institutio Oratoria, Book 2, 1:16 [Online]. Edited by Harold Edgeworth Butler. http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/.
  • Ratcliffe, Matthew. “Why Mood Matters.” In Cambridge Companion to Heidegger’s Being and Time, edited by Mark A. Wrathall, 157–76. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2013.
  • Reeves, Joshua. “Automatic for the People: The Automation of Communicative Labor.” Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies 13, no. 2 (2016): 150–65.
  • Rettie, Hannah, and Jo Daniels. “Coping and Tolerance of Uncertainty: Predictors and Mediators of Mental Health During the COVID-19 Pandemic.” American Psychologist 76, no. 3 (2020): 427–37.
  • Reyes, G. Mitchell. “The Horizons of Judgement in Mathematical Discourse: Copulas, Economics, and Subprime Mortgages.” In Arguing with Numbers: The Intersections of Rhetoric and Mathematics, edited by James Wynn and G. Mitchell Reyes, 82–121. University Park: The Pennsylvania University Press, 2021.
  • _____. “The Rhetoric in Mathematics: Newton, Leibniz, the Calculus, and the Rhetorical Force of the Infinitesimal.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 90, no. 2 (2004): 163–88.
  • Reyman, Jessica. “The Rhetorical Agency of Algorithms.” In Theorizing Digital Rhetoric, edited by Aaron Hess and Amber Davisson, 112–25. London: Routledge, 2018.
  • Reyman, Jessica, and Erika M. Sparby. “Introduction: Toward an Ethic of Responsibility in Digital Aggression.” In Digital Ethics: Rhetoric and Responsibility in Online Aggression, edited by Jessica Reyman and Erika M. Sparby, 1–14. New York: Routledge, 2019.
  • Rice, Jenny. “The Rhetorical Aesthetics of More: On Archival Magnitude.” Philosophy & Rhetoric 50, no. 1 (2017): 26–49.
  • Richards, Riley J., Patric R. Spence, and Chad Edwards. “Human-Machine Communication Scholarship Trends: An Examination of Research From 2011 to 2021 in Communication Journals.” Human–Machine Communication 4, no. 1 (2022): 45–62.
  • Rickert, Thomas J. Ambient Rhetoric: The Attunements of Rhetorical Being. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2013.
  • _____. “Preliminary Steps Toward a General Rhetoric: Existence, Thrivation, Transformation.” In Handbook on Comparative Rhetoric, edited by Keith Lloyd, 414–21. New York: Routledge, 2020.
  • Page 152 →Robertson, Adi. “Your Favorite Twitter Bot Might Die Next Week.” The Verge, February 2, 2023. www.theverge.com/2023/2/2/23582982/.
  • Robinson, Abby. “Online Tool Creates Catch-Up Immunization Schedules for Missed Childhood Vaccinations.” Horizons, April 1, 2022. https://rh.gatech.edu.
  • Rojas, Raúl, and Ulf Hashagen. The First Computers: History and Architectures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2000.
  • Roland, Alex, and Philip Shiman. Strategic Computing: DARPA and the Quest for Machine Intelligence, 1983–1993. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2002.
  • Roose, Kevin. “A Conversation with Bing’s Chatbot Left Me Deeply Unsettled.” New York Times, February 16, 2023.
  • Roundtree, Aimee Kendall. Computer Simulation, Rhetoric, and the Scientific Imagination: How Virtual Evidence Shapes Science in the Making and in the News. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2013.
  • Rudschies, Catharina, Ingrid Schneider, and Judith Simon. “Value Pluralism in the AI Ethics Debate–Different Actors, Different Priorities.” The International Review of Information Ethics 29 (2020): 1–15.
  • “schedule-service.js” [JavaScript File]. Vaccine Scheduler, accessed March 2018, https://web.archive.org/web/20180322130655/https://vacscheduler.org/.
  • Schlesinger, Ari, Kenton P. O’Hara, and Alex S. Taylor. “Let’s Talk About Race: Identity, Chatbots, and AI.” In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–14. New York: ACM, 2018.
  • Schwartz, Eric Hal. “EXCLUSIVE: Amazon Alexa Has Removed Coronavirus Skills and Won’t Approve New Ones.” VoiceBot, March 17, 2020. https://voicebot.ai/2020/03/17/.
  • Seeger, Anna-Maria, and Armin Heinzl. “Human Versus Machine: Contingency Factors of Anthropomorphism as a Trust-Inducing Design Strategy for Conversational Agents.” In Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organization 25, edited by Fred D. Davis, René Riedl, Jan vom Brocke, Pierre-Majorique Léger, and Adriane B. Randolph, 129–39. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International, 2018.
  • Sezgin, Emre, Yungui Huang, Ujjwal Ramtekkar, and Simon Lin. “Readiness for Voice Assistants to Support Healthcare Delivery During a Health Crisis and Pandemic.” npj Digital Medicine 3, Article 122 (2020): 1–4.
  • Shah, Saquib. “Microsoft’s ‘Zo’ Chatbot Picked up Some Offensive Habits.” Engadget, April 4, 201. www.engadget.com.
  • Shead, Sam. “Here’s Why Microsoft’s Teen Chatbot Turned into a Genocidal Racist, According to an AI Expert.” Business Insider, March 24, 2016. www.businessinsider. com.
  • Silva, Cristina. “Who Won the Republican Debate Saturday? Donald Trump Is a Winner because Marco Rubio Had a Bad Night.” International Business Times, February 6, 2016. www.ibtimes.com.
  • Page 153 →Simis, Molly J., Haley Madden, Michael A. Cacciatore, and Sara K. Yeo. “The Lure of Rationality: Why Does the Deficit Model Persist in Science Communication?” Public Understanding of Science 25, no. 4 (2016): 400–414.
  • Smalley, Hannah K., Pinar Keskinocak, Faramroze G. Engineer, and Larry K. Pickering. “Universal Tool for Vaccine Scheduling: Applications for Children and Adults.” Interfaces 41, no. 5 (2011): 436–54.
  • Socher, Richard, Alex Perelygin, Jean Y. Wu, Jason Chuang, Christopher D. Manning, Andrew Y. Ng, and Christopher Potts. “Recursive Deep Models for Semantic Compositionality Over a Sentiment Treebank.” In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, edited by David Yarowsky, Timothy Baldwin, Anna Korhonen, Karen Livescu, and Steven Bethard, 1631–42. Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computation Linguistics, 2013.
  • Soper, Taylor. “Amazon Alexa Leader: COVID-19 Has Sparked a Huge Increase in the Use of Voice in the Home.” GeekWire, June 25, 2020, https://www.geekwire.com/2020.
  • Spice, Byron. “Most Presidential Candidates Speak at Grade 6–8.” Carnegie Mellon University, March 16, 2016. www.cmu.edu/news/stories/archives/2016/march/speechifying.html.
  • Spinuzzi, Clay. “‘Light Green Doesn’t Mean Hydrology!’: Toward a Visual–Rhetorical Framework for Interface Design.” Computers and Composition 18, no. 1 (2001): 39–53.
  • Staff and Agencies. “Microsoft ‘Deeply Sorry’ for Racist and Sexist Tweets by AI Chatbot.” The Guardian, March 26, 2016. www.theguardian.com.
  • Strong, John S. “Asoka and the Buddha Relics.” In Relics of the Buddha, 124–49. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2004.
  • Sullivan, Dale. “The Epideictic Rhetoric of Science.” Journal of Business and Technical Communication 5, no. 3 (1991): 229–45.
  • Swaim, Barton. “How Donald Trump’s Language Works for Him.” Washington Post, September 15, 2015, https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2015/09/15/.
  • Szolovits, Peter. “Knowledge-Based Systems: A Survey.” In On Knowledge Base Management Systems: Integrating Artificial Intelligence and Database Technologies, edited by Michael L. Brodie and John Mylopoulos, 339–52. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1986.
  • Tal, Aner, and Brian Wansink. “Blinded with Science: Trivial Graphs and Formulas Increase Ad Persuasiveness and Belief in Product Efficacy.” Public Understanding of Science 25, no. 1 (2016): 117–25.
  • Turkle, Sherry. Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other. New York: Basic Books, 2012. Twitter. Twitter API. Accessed May 20, 2023, https://developer.twitter.com/en/products/twitter-api.
  • Page 154 →U.S. Census Bureau. “2013 ACS 1-year Public Use Microdata Samples,” accessed July 28, 2017. https://factfinder.census.gov/faces/nav/jsf/pages/searchresults.xhtml?refresh=t.
  • U.S. Food and Drug Administration. “Engerix-B, Package Insert,” retrieved May 4, 2018. https://www.fda.gov/media/119403/download.
  • Vaccine Ingredients Calculator. “About the Vaccine Ingredients Calculator.” April 20, 2018, http://vaxcalc.org.
  • _____. “Discover the Ingredients in the Vaccines that Your Doctor Recommends.” retrieved April 20, 2018, http://vaxcalc.org.
  • _____. “STEP 1 of 2: Tell Us About Who is Being Vaccinated.” retrieved April 20, 2018, https://vaxcalc.org/calc-step-1.
  • _____. “STEP 2: Choose Vaccines for [Name].” retrieved April 20, 2018, https://vaxcalc.org/calc-step-2.
  • van der Linden, Sander, Anthony Leiserowitz, Seth Rosenthal, and Edward Maibach. “Inoculating the Public Against Misinformation about Climate Change.” Global Challenges 1 (2017): 1–7.
  • van der Linden, Sander, and Jon Roozenbeek. “Psychological Inoculation Against Fake News.” In The Psychology of Fake News: Accepting, Sharing, and Correcting Misinformation, edited by Rainer Greifeneder, Mariela Jaffe, Eryn Newman, and Norbert Schwarz, 147–69. London: Routledge, 2021.
  • van der Linden, Sander, Jon Roozenbeek, and Josh Compton. “Inoculating Against Fake News About COVID-19.” Frontiers in Psychology 11, 566790 (2020): 1–7.
  • VaxCalc-Labs. “vaccine-ingredients-data,” May 11, 2016, GitHub, retrieved May 3, 2018, https://github.com/VaxCalc-Labs.
  • Vee, Annette. Coding Literacy: How Computer Programming Is Changing Writing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2017.
  • _____. “Full Stack Rhetoric: A Response to Rhetorical Machines.” In Rhetorical Machines: Writing, Code, and Computational Ethics, edited by John Jones and Livinia Hirsu, 237–44. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press, 2019.
  • Vee, Annette, and James J. Brown Jr. “Rhetoric Special Issue Editorial Introduction.” Computational Culture 5 (2016): 1–20.
  • Veruggio, Gianmarco, and Fiorella Operto. “Roboethics: Social and Ethical Implications of Robotics.” In Springer Handbook of Robotics, edited by Bruno Sciliano and Oussama Khatib, 2135–60. New York: Springer, 2008.
  • Walker, Jeffrey. Rhetoric and Poetics in Antiquity. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.
  • Walsh, Lynda. Scientists as Prophets: A Rhetorical Genealogy. New York: Oxford University Press, 2013.
  • Walton, Douglas. Ad Hominem Arguments. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press, 1998.
  • Page 155 →Wardrip-Fruin, Noah. Expressive Processing: Digital Fictions, Computer Games, and Software Studies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2009.
  • Weizenbaum, Joseph. Computer Power and Human Reason: From Judgement to Calculation. New York: W. H. Freeman, 1976.
  • Wikipedia. “About,” accessed March 21, 2021. https://en.wikipedia.org/.
  • Williams, Bernard A. O., and Thomas Nagel. “Moral Luck.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes 50 (1976): 115–35.
  • Winston, Brian. “Mechanising Calculation.” In Media, Technology, and Society: A History from the Telegraph to the Internet, 147–65. London: Routledge, 2003.
  • Wise, J. Macgregor. “Towards a Minor Assemblage: An Introduction to the Clickable World.” In Theorizing Digital Rhetoric, edited by Aaron Hess and Amber Davisson, 68–82. New York: Routledge, 2018.
  • Wood, Michelle L. M. “Rethinking the Inoculation Analogy: Effects on Subjects with Differing Preexisting Attitudes.” Human Communication Research 33, no. 3 (2007): 357–78.
  • Woods, Heather Suzanne. “Asking More of Siri and Alexa: Feminine Persona in Service of Surveillance Capitalism.” Critical Studies in Media Communication 35, no. 4 (2018): 334–49.
  • World Health Organization. “Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Situation Report—86.” April 15, 2020. https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/situation-reports/.
  • Wynn, James. Citizen Science in the Digital Age: Rhetoric, Science, and Public Engagement. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press, 2017.
  • Yasuoka, Koichi, and Motoko Yasuoka. “On the Prehistory of QWERTY.” ZINBUN 42 (2011): 161–74.
  • Yoston Lawrence, Heidi. Vaccine Rhetorics. Columbus: The Ohio State University Press, 2020.
  • Zagacki, Kenneth S., and Victoria J. Gallagher. “Rhetoric and Materiality in the Museum Park at the North Carolina Museum of Art.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 95, no. 2 (2009): 171–91.
  • Zarocostas, John. “How to Fight an Infodemic.” The Lancet 395, no. 10225 (2020): 676.
  • Zhang, Jia. “Introducing censusAmericans, a Twitter Bot for America.” FiveThirtyEight, accessed July 28, 2017. https://fivethirtyeight.com.
  • Ziewitz, Malte. “Governing Algorithms: Myth, Mess, and Methods.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 41, no. 1 (2016): 3–16.

Annotate

Next Chapter
Index
PreviousNext
© 2023 University of South Carolina
Powered by Manifold Scholarship. Learn more at
Opens in new tab or windowmanifoldapp.org